% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Roller:808697,
      author       = {Roller, David and Bläsing, Marc and Dreger, Inge and
                      Yazdanbakhsh, F. and Sawada, J. and Kuznicki, S. and
                      Müller, Michael},
      title        = {{R}emoval of {H}ydrogen {S}ulphide by {M}etal-{D}oped
                      {N}anotitanate {U}nder {G}asification {L}ike {C}onditions},
      journal      = {Industrial $\&$ engineering chemistry research},
      volume       = {55},
      number       = {14},
      issn         = {0888-5885},
      address      = {Columbus, Ohio},
      publisher    = {American Chemical Society},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2016-02324},
      pages        = {3871-3878},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {A comparative study between nanotitanate doped with
                      different metals (copper, copper–chromium, and cerium) is
                      executed under gasification conditions in order to
                      investigate their maximum H2S removal ability and their
                      breakthrough behavior. Therefore, the sorbent is placed in a
                      fixed-bed reactor and exposed to the H2S containing gas flow
                      at temperatures ranging from 75 to 950 °C. Online analysis
                      is done by a mass spectrometer. The sorbents are also tested
                      by the offline analytical techniques X-ray diffraction (XRD)
                      and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the experiments
                      to provide detailed information about their elemental and
                      crystalline composition. The results indicate Cu-ETS-2 as
                      the most effective H2S-scrubber among the tested sorbents.
                      The lowest H2S concentration in the outlet gas is always
                      achieved in water rich gas. Additionally, the H2S capacity
                      is nearly always higher for the water rich gas than in the
                      hydrogen rich gas.},
      cin          = {IEK-2},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-2-20101013},
      pnm          = {111 - Efficient and Flexible Power Plants (POF3-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000374274200001},
      doi          = {10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03991},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808697},
}