001     808931
005     20210129222917.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/gi-5-109-2016
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/11188
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000378207600010
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-02451
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Bircher, S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Soil moisture sensor calibration for organic soil surface layers
260 _ _ |a Göttingen
|c 2016
|b Copernicus Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1463467319_27927
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a This paper’s objective is to present generic cali-bration functions for organic surface layers derived for thesoil moisture sensors Decagon ECH2O 5TE and Delta-TThetaProbe ML2x, using material from northern regions,mainly from the Finnish Meteorological Institute’s ArcticResearch Center in Sodankylä and the study area of the Dan-ish Center for Hydrology (HOBE). For the Decagon 5TEsensor such a function is currently not reported in the lit-erature. Data were compared with measurements from un-derlying mineral soils including laboratory and field mea-surements. Shrinkage and charring during drying were con-sidered. For both sensors all field and lab data showed con-sistent trends. For mineral layers with low soil organic mat-ter (SOM) content the validity of the manufacturer’s calibra-tions was demonstrated. Deviating sensor outputs in organicand mineral horizons were identified. For the Decagon 5TE,apparent relative permittivities at a given moisture contentdecreased for increased SOM content, which was attributedto an increase of bound water in organic materials with largespecific surface areas compared to the studied mineral soils.ThetaProbe measurements from organic horizons showedstronger nonlinearity in the sensor response and signal satu-ration in the high-level data. The derived calibration fit func-tions between sensor response and volumetric water contenthold for samples spanning a wide range of humus types withdiffering SOM characteristics. This strengthens confidencein their validity under various conditions, rendering them highly suitable for large-scale applications in remote sensingand land surface modeling studies. Agreement between in-dependent Decagon 5TE and ThetaProbe time series from anorganic surface layer at the Sodankylä site was significantlyimproved when the here-proposed fit functions were used.Decagon 5TE data also well-reflected precipitation events.Thus, Decagon 5TE network data from organic surface lay-ers at the Sodankylä and HOBE sites are based on the here-proposed natural log fit. The newly derived ThetaProbe fitfunctions should be used for hand-held applications only,but prove to be of value for the acquisition of instantaneouslarge-scale soil moisture estimates.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a EXPEER - Distributed Infrastructure for EXPErimentation in Ecosystem Research (262060)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)262060
|c 262060
|f FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2010-1
|x 1
700 1 _ |a Andreasen, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Vuollet, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Vehvilainen, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rautiainen, K.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Jonard, Francois
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129478
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Weihermüller, Lutz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Zakharova, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Wigneron, J.-P.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Kerr, Y. H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/gi-5-109-2016
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2690575-9
|p 109-125
|t Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems
|v 5
|y 2016
|x 2193-0856
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808931/files/gi-5-109-2016.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:808931
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129478
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21