000808946 001__ 808946
000808946 005__ 20210129222920.0
000808946 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/jxb/erv456
000808946 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-0957
000808946 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1460-2431
000808946 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/10835
000808946 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000367816300020
000808946 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:4664519
000808946 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:26482242
000808946 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-02460
000808946 082__ $$a580
000808946 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)162136$$aCendrero, Pilar$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000808946 245__ $$aPlant chlorophyll fluorescence: active and passive measurements at canopy and leaf scales with different nitrogen treatments
000808946 260__ $$aOxford$$bOxford Univ. Press$$c2016
000808946 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000808946 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000808946 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1463030291_13735
000808946 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000808946 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000808946 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000808946 520__ $$aMost studies assessing chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlF) have examined leaf responses to environmental stress conditions using active techniques. Alternatively, passive techniques are able to measure ChlF at both leaf and canopy scales. However, the measurement principles of both techniques are different, and only a few datasets concerning the relationships between them are reported in the literature. In this study, we investigated the potential for interchanging ChlF measurements using active techniques with passive measurements at different temporal and spatial scales. The ultimate objective was to determine the limits within which active and passive techniques are comparable. The results presented in this study showed that active and passive measurements were highly correlated over the growing season across nitrogen treatments at both canopy and leaf-average scale. At the single-leaf scale, the seasonal relation between techniques was weaker, but still significant. The variability within single-leaf measurements was largely related to leaf heterogeneity associated with variations in CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance, and less so to variations in leaf chlorophyll content, leaf size or measurement inputs (e.g. light reflected and emitted by the leaf and illumination conditions and leaf spectrum). This uncertainty was exacerbated when single-leaf analysis was limited to a particular day rather than the entire season. We concluded that daily measurements of active and passive ChlF at the single-leaf scale are not comparable. However, canopy and leaf-average active measurements can be used to better understand the daily and seasonal behaviour of passive ChlF measurements. In turn, this can be used to better estimate plant photosynthetic capacity and therefore to provide improved information for crop management.Key words
000808946 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000808946 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-252$$a252 - Sustainable Plant Production in a Changing Environment (POF3-252)$$cPOF3-252$$fPOF III$$x1
000808946 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoran, M. Susan$$b1
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPapuga, Shirley A.$$b2
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aThorp, K. R.$$b3
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlonso, L.$$b4
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoreno, J.$$b5
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPonce-Campos, G.$$b6
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, U.$$b7$$ufzj
000808946 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, G.$$b8
000808946 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1466717-4$$a10.1093/jxb/erv456$$gVol. 67, no. 1, p. 275 - 286$$n1$$p275 - 286$$tThe journal of experimental botany$$v67$$x1460-2431$$y2016
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000808946 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808946/files/J.%20Exp.%20Bot.-2016-Cendrero-Mateo-275-86.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000808946 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:808946$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000808946 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)162136$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000808946 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000808946 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000808946 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-252$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vSustainable Plant Production in a Changing Environment$$x1
000808946 9141_ $$y2016
000808946 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ EXP BOT : 2014
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bJ EXP BOT : 2014
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0400$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz / DFG
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000808946 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000808946 920__ $$lyes
000808946 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000808946 980__ $$ajournal
000808946 980__ $$aVDB
000808946 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000808946 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000808946 9801_ $$aFullTexts