% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Julitta:808947,
      author       = {Julitta, Tommaso and Corp, Lawrence and Rossini, Micol and
                      Burkart, Andreas and Cogliati, Sergio and Davies, Neville
                      and Hom, Milton and Mac Arthur, Alasdair and Middleton,
                      Elizabeth and Rascher, Uwe and Schickling, Anke and Colombo,
                      Roberto},
      title        = {{C}omparison of {S}un-{I}nduced {C}hlorophyll
                      {F}luorescence {E}stimates {O}btained from {F}our {P}ortable
                      {F}ield {S}pectroradiometers},
      journal      = {Remote sensing},
      volume       = {8},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {2072-4292},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2016-02461},
      pages        = {122 -},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {Remote Sensing of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence
                      (SIF) is a research field of growing interest because it
                      offers the potential to quantify actual photosynthesis and
                      to monitor plant status. New satellite missions from the
                      European Space Agency, such as the Earth Explorer 8
                      FLuorescence EXplorer (FLEX) mission—scheduled to launch
                      in 2022 and aiming at SIF mapping—and from the National
                      Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) such as the
                      Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) sampling mission
                      launched in July 2014, provide the capability to estimate
                      SIF from space. The detection of the SIF signal from
                      airborne and satellite platform is difficult and reliable
                      ground level data are needed for calibration/validation.
                      Several commercially available spectroradiometers are
                      currently used to retrieve SIF in the field. This study
                      presents a comparison exercise for evaluating the capability
                      of four spectroradiometers to retrieve SIF. The results show
                      that an accurate far-red SIF estimation can be achieved
                      using spectroradiometers with an ultrafine resolution (less
                      than 1 nm), while the red SIF estimation requires even
                      higher spectral resolution (less than 0.5 nm). Moreover, it
                      is shown that the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) plays a
                      significant role in the precision of the far-red SIF
                      measurements.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000371898800012},
      doi          = {10.3390/rs8020122},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/808947},
}