000809514 001__ 809514
000809514 005__ 20220930130100.0
000809514 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.014
000809514 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1053-8119
000809514 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9572
000809514 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000377048600014
000809514 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:5609609
000809514 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:26883063
000809514 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-02602
000809514 082__ $$a610
000809514 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144165$$aKuzmanovic, Bojana$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000809514 245__ $$aThe role of the neural reward circuitry in self-referential optimistic belief updates
000809514 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2016
000809514 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000809514 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000809514 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1464081788_6314
000809514 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000809514 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000809514 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000809514 520__ $$aPeople are motivated to adopt the most favorable beliefs about their future because positive beliefs are experienced as rewarding. However, it is so far inconclusive whether brain regions known to represent reward values are involved in the generation of optimistically biased belief updates. To address this question, we investigated neural correlates of belief updates that result in relatively better future outlooks, and therefore imply a positive subjective value of the judgment outcome. Participants estimated the probability of experiencing different adverse future events. After being provided with population base rates of these events, they had the opportunity to update their initial estimates. Participants made judgments concerning themselves or a similar other, and were confronted with desirable or undesirable base rates (i.e., lower or higher than their initial estimates).Belief updates were smaller following undesirable than desirable information, and this optimism bias was stronger for judgments regarding oneself than others. During updating, the positive value of self-related updates was reflected by neural activity in the subgenual ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) that increased both with increasing sizes of favorable updates, and with decreasing sizes of unfavorable updates. During the processing of self-related undesirable base rates, increasing activity in a network including the dorsomedial PFC, hippocampus, thalamus and ventral striatum predicted decreasing update sizes.Thus, key regions of the neural reward circuitry contributed to the generation of optimistically biased self-referential belief updates. While the vmPFC tracked subjective values of belief updates, a network including the ventral striatum was involved in neglecting information calling for unfavorable updates.
000809514 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$a574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)$$cPOF3-574$$fPOF III$$x0
000809514 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000809514 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144814$$aJefferson, Anneli$$b1
000809514 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145756$$aVogeley, Kai$$b2$$ufzj
000809514 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.014$$gVol. 133, p. 151 - 162$$p151 - 162$$tNeuroImage$$v133$$x1053-8119$$y2016
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000809514 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000809514 8767_ $$92015-02-13$$d2015-02-13$$eOther$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zUSD 75,- ; von Cerebral Cortex nicht akzeptiert, daher keine DOI
000809514 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:809514$$pOpenAPC$$pVDB$$popenCost
000809514 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145756$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000809514 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vTheory, modelling and simulation$$x0
000809514 9141_ $$y2016
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2014
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2014
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000809514 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000809514 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406$$kINM-8$$lEthik in den Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000809514 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x1
000809514 980__ $$ajournal
000809514 980__ $$aVDB
000809514 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000809514 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
000809514 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000809514 980__ $$aAPC
000809514 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406