001     809514
005     20220930130100.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.014
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1053-8119
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-9572
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000377048600014
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:5609609
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:26883063
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-02602
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Kuzmanovic, Bojana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144165
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a The role of the neural reward circuitry in self-referential optimistic belief updates
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|c 2016
|b Academic Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1464081788_6314
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a People are motivated to adopt the most favorable beliefs about their future because positive beliefs are experienced as rewarding. However, it is so far inconclusive whether brain regions known to represent reward values are involved in the generation of optimistically biased belief updates. To address this question, we investigated neural correlates of belief updates that result in relatively better future outlooks, and therefore imply a positive subjective value of the judgment outcome. Participants estimated the probability of experiencing different adverse future events. After being provided with population base rates of these events, they had the opportunity to update their initial estimates. Participants made judgments concerning themselves or a similar other, and were confronted with desirable or undesirable base rates (i.e., lower or higher than their initial estimates).Belief updates were smaller following undesirable than desirable information, and this optimism bias was stronger for judgments regarding oneself than others. During updating, the positive value of self-related updates was reflected by neural activity in the subgenual ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) that increased both with increasing sizes of favorable updates, and with decreasing sizes of unfavorable updates. During the processing of self-related undesirable base rates, increasing activity in a network including the dorsomedial PFC, hippocampus, thalamus and ventral striatum predicted decreasing update sizes.Thus, key regions of the neural reward circuitry contributed to the generation of optimistically biased self-referential belief updates. While the vmPFC tracked subjective values of belief updates, a network including the ventral striatum was involved in neglecting information calling for unfavorable updates.
536 _ _ |a 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|c POF3-574
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Jefferson, Anneli
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144814
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Vogeley, Kai
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145756
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.014
|g Vol. 133, p. 151 - 162
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8
|p 151 - 162
|t NeuroImage
|v 133
|y 2016
|x 1053-8119
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.gif?subformat=icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/809514/files/1-s2.0-S105381191600121X-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:809514
|p VDB
|p OpenAPC
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145756
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Theory, modelling and simulation
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b NEUROIMAGE : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
|k INM-8
|l Ethik in den Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21