001     810072
005     20210129223259.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1334
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1078-0432
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1557-3265
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000375329100015
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:4889208
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:26673798
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-02953
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Kebir, S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic Value of Dynamic O-(2-[$^{18}$F]fluoroethyl)-L-Tyrosine PET
260 _ _ |a Philadelphia, Pa. [u.a.]
|c 2016
|b AACR
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1465366131_20095
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Purpose: Pseudoprogression (PsP) is characterized by therapy-associated but not tumor growth–associated increases of contrast-enhancing glioblastoma lesions on MRI. Although typically occurring during the first 3 months after radiochemotherapy, PsP may occur later in the course of the disease and may then be particularly difficult to distinguish from true tumor progression. We explored PET using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET-PET) to approach the diagnostic dilemma.Experimental Design: Twenty-six patients with glioblastoma that presented with increasing contrast-enhancing lesions later than 3 months after completion of radiochemotherapy underwent 18F-FET–PET. Maximum and mean tumor/brain ratios (TBRmax and TBRmean) of 18F-FET uptake as well as time-to-peak (TTP) and patterns of the time-activity curves were determined. The final diagnosis of true progression versus late PsP was based on follow-up MRI using RANO criteria.Results: Late PsP occurred in 7 patients with a median time from radiochemotherapy completion of 24 weeks while the remaining patients showed true tumor progression. TBRmax and TBRmean were significantly higher in patients with true progression than in patients with late PsP (TBRmax 2.4 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.003; TBRmean 2.1 ± 0.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.2, P = 0.012) whereas TTP was significantly shorter (mean TTP 25 ± 2 vs. 40 ± 2 min, P < 0.001). ROC analysis yielded an optimal cutoff value of 1.9 for TBRmax to differentiate between true progression and late PsP (sensitivity 84%, specificity 86%, accuracy 85%, P = 0.015).Conclusions: O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET provides valuable information in assessing the elusive phenomenon of late PsP. Clin Cancer Res; 22(9); 2190–6. ©2015 AACR.
536 _ _ |a 573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|c POF3-573
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Fimmers, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, N.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Scha fer, N.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Mack, F.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)133103
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Schaub, C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Stuplich, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Niessen, M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132482
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Tzaridis, T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Simon, M.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131334
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Stoffels, G.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Langen, K.-J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Scheffler, B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Glas, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Herrlinger, U.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
773 _ _ |a 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1334
|g Vol. 22, no. 9, p. 2190 - 2196
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2036787-9
|n 9
|p 2190 - 2196
|t Clinical cancer research
|v 22
|y 2016
|x 1557-3265
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:810072
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131334
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Neuroimaging
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLIN CANCER RES : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b CLIN CANCER RES : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
|k INM-4
|l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IKP-4-20111104
|k IKP-4
|l Kernphysikalische Großgeräte
|x 2
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-82)080010_20140620
|k JARA-BRAIN
|l JARA-BRAIN
|x 3
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IKP-4-20111104
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-82)080010_20140620
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IKP-4-20111104


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21