% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Schallhart:810228,
author = {Schallhart, Simon and Rantala, Pekka and Nemitz, Eiko and
Taipale, Ditte and Tillmann, Ralf and Mentel, Thomas F. and
Loubet, Benjamin and Gerosa, Giacomo and Finco, Angelo and
Rinne, Janne and Ruuskanen, Taina M.},
title = {{C}haracterization of total ecosystem-scale biogenic {VOC}
exchange at a {M}editerranean oak–hornbeam forest},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {16},
number = {11},
issn = {1680-7324},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-03095},
pages = {7171 - 7194},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Recently, the number and amount of biogenically emitted
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) has been discussed in
great detail. Depending on the ecosystem, the published
number varies between a dozen and several hundred compounds.
We present ecosystem exchange fluxes from a mixed
oak–hornbeam forest in the Po Valley, Italy. The fluxes
were measured by a proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight
(PTR-ToF) mass spectrometer and calculated using the eddy
covariance (EC) method. Detectable fluxes were observed for
up to 29 compounds, dominated by isoprene, which comprised
over $60 \%$ of the total upward flux (on a molar basis).
The daily average of the total VOC upward flux was
10.4 nmol m−2 s−1. Methanol had the highest
concentration and accounted for the largest downward flux.
Methanol seemed to be deposited to dew, as the downward flux
happened in the early morning, right after the calculated
surface temperature came closest to the calculated dew point
temperature.We estimated that up to $30 \%$ of the upward
flux of methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) and methacrolein (MACR)
originated from atmospheric oxidation of isoprene. A
comparison between two methods for the flux detection
(manual and automated) was made. Their respective advantages
and disadvantages were discussed and the differences in
their results shown. Both provide comparable results.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000378354600031},
doi = {10.5194/acp-16-7171-2016},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810228},
}