guest ::
| Home > Publications database > A comparison and accuracy analysis of impedance-based temperature estimation methods for Li-ion batteries > print |
| Home > Publications database > A comparison and accuracy analysis of impedance-based temperature estimation methods for Li-ion batteries > print |
| 001 | 810844 | ||
| 005 | 20240712112828.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.103 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0306-2619 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1872-9118 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/11656 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000379370800011 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2016-03427 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 620 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Beelen, H. P. G. J. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a A comparison and accuracy analysis of impedance-based temperature estimation methods for Li-ion batteries |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2016 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1467094096_5434 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a In order to guarantee safe and proper use of Lithium-ion batteries during operation, an accurate estimate of the battery temperature is of paramount importance. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) can be used to estimate the battery temperature and several EIS-based temperature estimation methods have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we argue that all existing EIS-based methods implicitly distinguish two steps: experiment design and parameter estimation. The former step consists of choosing the excitation frequency and the latter step consists of estimating the battery temperature based on the measured impedance resulting from the chosen excitation. By distinguishing these steps and by performing Monte-Carlo simulations, all existing methods are compared in terms of accuracy (i.e., mean-square error) of the temperature estimate. The results of the comparison show that, due to different choices in the two steps, significant differences in accuracy of the estimate exist. More importantly, by jointly selecting the parameters of the experiment-design and parameter-estimation step, a more-accurate temperature estimate can be obtained. In case of an unknown State-of-Charge, this novel method estimates the temperature with an average absolute bias of View the MathML sourceC and an average standard deviation of View the MathML sourceC using a single impedance measurement for the battery under consideration. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131 |c POF3-131 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Raijmakers, L. H. J. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Donkers, M. C. F. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Notten, P. H. L. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165918 |b 3 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bergveld, H. J. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.103 |g Vol. 175, p. 128 - 140 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2000772-3 |p 128 - 140 |t Applied energy |v 175 |y 2016 |x 0306-2619 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.gif?subformat=icon |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-1440 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-180 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-640 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810844/files/1-s2.0-S0306261916305621-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:810844 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)165918 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100 |v Electrochemical Storage |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Energie |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2016 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b APPL ENERG : 2014 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b APPL ENERG : 2014 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218 |k IEK-9 |l Grundlagen der Elektrochemie |x 0 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218 |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-1-20110218 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|