Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Transcranial direct current stimulation in the male mouse to promote recovery after stroke > print

001     810957
005     20210129223638.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1177/0023677215610708
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0023-6772
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1758-1117
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000376294600006
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-03513
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Pikhovych, A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Transcranial direct current stimulation in the male mouse to promote recovery after stroke
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2016
|b Sage
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1467286496_21173
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) constitutes a promising approach for promoting recovery of function after stroke, although the underlying neurobiological mechanisms are unclear. To conduct translational research in animal models, stimulation parameters should not lead to neuronal lesions. Liebetanz et al. recommend charge densities for cathodal stimulation in rats, but parameters for mice are not established. We established tDCS in the wild-type mouse, enabling studies with genetically-engineered mice (GEM). tDCS equipment was adapted to fit the mouse skull. Using different polarities and charge densities, tDCS was safe to apply in the mouse where the charge density was below 198 kC/m2 for single or repeated stimulations. These findings are crucial for future investigations of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying tDCS using GEM.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Walter, H. L.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Mahabir, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Fink, G. R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Graf, R.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Schroeter, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Rueger, M. A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1177/0023677215610708
|g Vol. 50, no. 3, p. 212 - 216
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2036511-1
|n 3
|p 212 - 216
|t Laboratory animals
|v 50
|y 2016
|x 1758-1117
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:810957
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b LAB ANIM-UK : 2013
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21