% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hecht:810970,
author = {Hecht, Vera Lisa and Temperton, Vicky and Nagel, Kerstin
and Rascher, Uwe and Postma, Johannes Auke},
title = {{S}owing {D}ensity: {A} {N}eglected {F}actor
{F}undamentally {A}ffecting {R}oot {D}istribution and
{B}iomass {A}llocation of {F}ield {G}rown {S}pring {B}arley
({H}ordeum {V}ulgare {L}.)},
journal = {Frontiers in Functional Plant Ecology},
volume = {7},
issn = {1664-462X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media88991},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-03525},
pages = {944},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Studies on the function of root traits and the genetic
variation in these traits are often conducted under
controlled conditions using individual potted plants. Little
is known about root growth under field conditions and how
root traits are affected by agronomic practices in
particular sowing density. We hypothesized that with
increasing sowing density, root length density (root length
per soil volume, cm cm−3) increases in the topsoil as well
as specific root length (root length per root dry weight, cm
g−1) due to greater investment in fine roots. Therefore,
we studied two spring barley cultivars at ten different
sowing densities (24–340 seeds m−2) in 2 consecutive
years in a clay loam field in Germany and established sowing
density dose-response curves for several root and shoot
traits. We took soil cores for measuring roots up to a depth
of 60 cm in and between plant rows (inter-row distance 21
cm). Root length density increased with increasing sowing
density and was greatest in the plant row in the topsoil
(0–10 cm). Greater sowing density increased specific root
length partly through greater production of fine roots in
the topsoil. Rooting depth (D50) of the major root axes
(root diameter class 0.4–1.0 mm) was not affected. Root
mass fraction decreased, while stem mass fraction increased
with sowing density and over time. Leaf mass fraction was
constant over sowing density but greater leaf area was
realized through increased specific leaf area. Considering
fertilization, we assume that light competition caused
plants to grow more shoot mass at the cost of investment
into roots, which is partly compensated by increased
specific root length and shallow rooting. Increased biomass
per area with greater densities suggest that density
increases the efficiency of the cropping system, however,
declines in harvest index at densities over 230 plants m−2
suggest that this efficiency did not translate into greater
yield. We conclude that plant density is a modifier of root
architecture and that root traits and their utility in
breeding for greater productivity have to be understood in
the context of high sowing densities.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000378603200001},
pubmed = {pmid:27446171},
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2016.00944},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/810970},
}