000811407 001__ 811407
000811407 005__ 20210129223842.0
000811407 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1023/A:1026182211065
000811407 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0032-079X
000811407 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-5036
000811407 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000185919100014
000811407 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-03891
000811407 041__ $$aEnglish
000811407 082__ $$a570
000811407 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVega-Jarquin, C.$$b0
000811407 245__ $$aRapid immobilization of applied nitrogen in saline–alkaline soils
000811407 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2003
000811407 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000811407 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000811407 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1468503673_14771
000811407 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000811407 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000811407 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000811407 520__ $$aThe dynamics of inorganic N are important in soil, and this applies particularly to the saline–alkaline soils of the former lake Texcoco in Mexico with high pH and salinity where a forestation program was started in the 1970s. In soils of lake Texcoco, in Mexico, more than 50% of applied N could not be accounted for one day after application of 200 mg kg−1 soil along with glucose amendment. It was not clear whether this was due to abiotic or biotic processes, the form of inorganic N applied or the result of applying an easily decomposable substrate. We investigated this by adding glucose and 200 mg kg−1 soil as (NH4)2SO4-N or KNO3-N to sterilized and unsterilized soil. The changes in inorganic and ninhydrin N, microbial biomass C and production of CO2 were then monitored. Between the time of applying N and extraction with 0.5 M K2SO4, i.e., after ca 2 h, approximately 110 mg NH4+-N kg−1 dry soil could not be accounted for in the unsterilized and sterilized soil and that remained so for the entire incubation in the sterilized soil. After 1 day this increased to 140 mg NH4+-N kg−1 dry soil in the unsterilized control and 170 mg NH4+-N kg−1 dry soil in C amended soil. Volatilization of NH3 accounted for 56 mg NH4+-N kg−1 so the rest appeared to be adsorbed on the soil matrix. The NH3 volatilization and NH4+ fixed in the soil matrix remained constant over time and no oxidation to NO2− or NO3 − had occurred, so unaccounted N in unsterilized soil was probably incorporated into the microbial biomass in excess of what was required for metabolic activity. The unaccounted N was ca 70 mg NO3−–N in nitrate amended soil after 3 days and 138 NO3−–N when glucose was additionally added. Losses through abiotic processes were absent as inferred from changes in sterilized soil and the aerobic incubation inhibited possible losses through denitrification. It was inferred that NO3− that could not be accounted for was taken up by micro-organisms in excess of what was required for metabolic activity.
000811407 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000811407 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000811407 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGarcia-Mendoza, M.$$b1
000811407 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129475$$aJablonowski, N.$$b2$$ufzj
000811407 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLuna-Guido, M.$$b3
000811407 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDendooven, L.$$b4$$eCorresponding author
000811407 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1478535-3$$a10.1023/A:1026182211065$$gVol. 256, no. 2, p. 379 - 388$$n2$$p379 - 388$$tPlant and soil$$v256$$x0032-079X$$y2003
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.pdf$$yRestricted
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000811407 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811407/files/art_10.1023_A_1026182211065.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000811407 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:811407$$pVDB
000811407 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129475$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000811407 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLANT SOIL : 2014
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000811407 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000811407 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000811407 980__ $$ajournal
000811407 980__ $$aVDB
000811407 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000811407 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED