001     811705
005     20210129223918.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.145
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0048-9697
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-1026
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000375136600008
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 2128/18653
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-04089
082 _ _ |a 333.7
100 1 _ |a Mukherjee, Santanu
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145606
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Sorption–desorption behaviour of bentazone, boscalid and pyrimethanil in biochar and digestate based soil mixtures for biopurification systems
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2016
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1470058502_28385
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Pesticide pollution caused by point or diffuse sources may lead to the contamination of ground and surface water. Biobed or biofilter systems, which are filled with a variety of organic materials (soil, peat and straw), are commonly used on farm to treat pesticide remnants. The objective of this study was to assess the sorption–desorption potential of three pesticides with contrasting physico-chemical properties (bentazone, boscalid, and pyrimethanil) on novel biofilter materials based on bioenergy residues (mixtures of soil with digestate and/or biochar) in laboratory batch equilibrium experiments.The results show that the biomixtures of digestate and biochar with soil increased pesticides sorption potential and the 1/ndes values were lower than the 1/nads values indicating that the desorption was hysteretic for all pesticides on these materials. The adsorption and desorption of all the chemicals conformed to linear and Freundlich isotherms. Higher values of distribution [Kd (> 78 L kg− 1)] and Freundlich sorption coefficient [Kf (> 900 μg1–1/n L1/n kg− 1)] were observed for all pesticides for the digestate and biochar based mixtures compared with the blank soil, which was attributed to the lower organic carbon content of the latter. However, unlike for sorption there was no statistically significant difference between the biochar and the digestate mixtures for pesticides desorption (p > 0.05; t-test). Specific UV-absorbances at 254 nm (SUVA254) indicated the aromatic character of digestate (5 and 30%) and biochar (5%) biomixture, which showed the highest organic-carbon-partition coefficients (Koc) and/or Kd values amongst all biomixtures for all pesticides. Therefore, these biomixtures were found to be the most promising substrates amongst the tested ones for a novel biobed setup and can be used as effective and alternative adsorbents for removing pesticides from percolating water in biofilters
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Weihermüller, Lutz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Tappe, Wolfgang
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129545
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Hofmann, Diana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129471
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Köppchen, Stephan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129490
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Laabs, Volker
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, Harry
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Burauel, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129442
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.145
|g Vol. 559, p. 63 - 73
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1498726-0
|p 63 - 73
|t The science of the total environment
|v 559
|y 2016
|x 0048-9697
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.gif?subformat=icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/1-s2.0-S0048969716305708-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811705/files/STOTEN%20Revised%20Manuscript_LW.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:811705
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145606
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129545
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129471
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129490
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129442
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b SCI TOTAL ENVIRON : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21