% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Stockinger:811874,
author = {Stockinger, Michael P. and Bogena, Heye and Lücke, Andreas
and Diekkrüger, Bernd and Cornelissen, Thomas and
Vereecken, Harry},
title = {{T}racer sampling frequency influences estimates of young
water fraction and streamwater transit time distribution},
journal = {Journal of hydrology},
volume = {541},
number = {Part B},
issn = {0022-1694},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-04216},
pages = {952–964},
year = {2016},
abstract = {The streamwater transit time distribution (TTD) of a
catchment is used to derive insights into the movement of
precipitation water via various flow paths to the
catchment’s stream. Typically, TTDs are estimated by using
the convolution integral to model a weekly tracer signal
measured in streamflow. Another approach for evaluating the
transit time of water to the catchment stream is the
fraction of young water (Fyw) in streamflow that is younger
than a certain threshold age, which also relies on tracer
data. However, few studies used tracer data with a higher
sampling frequency than weekly. To investigate the influence
of the sampling frequency of tracer data on estimates of TTD
and Fyw, we estimated both indicators for a humid, mesoscale
catchment in Germany using tracer data of weekly and higher
sampling frequency. We made use of a 1.5 year long time
series of daily to sub-daily precipitation and streamwater
isotope measurements, which were aggregated to create the
weekly resolution data set. We found that a higher sampling
frequency improved the stream isotope simulation compared to
a weekly one (0.35 vs. 0.24 Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency) and
showed more pronounced short-term dynamics in the simulation
result. The TTD based on the high temporal resolution data
was considerably different from the weekly one with a shift
towards faster transit times, while its corresponding mean
transit time of water particles was approximately reduced by
half (from 9.5 to 5 years). Similar to this, Fyw almost
doubled when applying high resolution data compared to
weekly one. Thus, the different approaches yield similar
results and strongly support each other. This indicates that
weekly isotope tracer data lack information about faster
water transport mechanisms in the catchment. Thus, we
conclude that a higher than weekly sampling frequency should
be preferred when investigating a catchment’s water
transport characteristics. When comparing TTDs or Fyw of
different catchments, the temporal resolution of the used
datasets needs to be considered.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000386410400024},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.007},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811874},
}