% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ainsbury:811921,
author = {Ainsbury, Elizabeth and Badie, Christophe and Barnard,
Stephen and Manning, Grainne and Moquet, Jayne and Abend,
Michael and Bassinet, Celine and Bortolin, Emanuela and
Bossin, Lily and Bricknell, Clare and Brzoska, Kamil and
Čemusová, Zina and Christiansson, Maria and Cosler,
Guillaume and Della Monaca, Sara and Desangles, François
and Discher, Michael and Doucha-Senf, Sven and Eakins, Jon
and Fattibene, Paola and Gregoire, Eric and Guogyte, Kamile
and Kriehuber, Ralf and Lee, Jungil and Lloyd, David and
Lyng, Fiona and Macaeva, Ellina and Majewski, Matthaeus and
McKeever, Stephen W. S. and Meade, Aidan and M’kacher,
Radhia and Medipally, Dinesh and Oestreicher, Ursula and
Oskamp, Dominik and Pateux, Jerome and Port, Matthias and
Quattrini, Maria Cristina and Quintens, Roel and Ricoul,
Michelle and Roy, Laurence and Sabatier, Laure and Sholom,
Sergey and Strunz, Sonja and Trompier, Francois and Valente,
Marco and Van Hoey, Olivier and Veronese, Ivan and Wojcik,
Andrzej and Woda, Clemens},
title = {{I}ntegration of new biological and physical retrospective
dosimetry methods into {EU} emergency response plans –
joint {RENEB} and {EURADOS} inter-laboratory comparisons},
journal = {International journal of radiation biology},
volume = {93},
number = {1},
issn = {1362-3095},
address = {Abingdon},
publisher = {Informa Healthcare84105},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-04235},
pages = {99-109},
year = {2016},
abstract = {PURPOSE:RENEB, 'Realising the European Network of
Biodosimetry and Physical Retrospective Dosimetry,' is a
network for research and emergency response mutual
assistance in biodosimetry within the EU. Within this
extremely active network, a number of new dosimetry methods
have recently been proposed or developed. There is a
requirement to test and/or validate these candidate
techniques and inter-comparison exercises are a
well-established method for such validation.MATERIALS AND
METHODS:The authors present details of inter-comparisons of
four such new methods: dicentric chromosome analysis
including telomere and centromere staining; the gene
expression assay carried out in whole blood; Raman
spectroscopy on blood lymphocytes, and detection of
radiation-induced thermoluminescent signals in glass screens
taken from mobile phones.RESULTS:In general the results show
good agreement between the laboratories and methods within
the expected levels of uncertainty, and thus demonstrate
that there is a lot of potential for each of the candidate
techniques.CONCLUSIONS:Further work is required before the
new methods can be included within the suite of reliable
dosimetry methods for use by RENEB partners and others in
routine and emergency response scenarios.},
cin = {S-US},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)S-US-20090406},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000392891400013},
pubmed = {pmid:27437830},
doi = {10.1080/09553002.2016.1206233},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/811921},
}