000817941 001__ 817941
000817941 005__ 20210129224047.0
000817941 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/rs8050412
000817941 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/12222
000817941 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000378406400056
000817941 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-04533
000817941 041__ $$aEnglish
000817941 082__ $$a620
000817941 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRossini, Micol$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000817941 245__ $$aAnalysis of Red and Far-Red Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Their Ratio in Different Canopies Based on Observed and Modeled Data
000817941 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2016
000817941 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000817941 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000817941 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1473753853_5964
000817941 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000817941 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000817941 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000817941 520__ $$aSun-induced canopy chlorophyll fluorescence in both the red (FR) and far-red (FFR) regions was estimated across a range of temporal scales and a range of species from different plant functional types using high resolution radiance spectra collected on the ground. Field measurements were collected with a state-of-the-art spectrometer setup and standardized methodology. Results showed that different plant species were characterized by different fluorescence magnitude. In general, the highest fluorescence emissions were measured in crops followed by broadleaf and then needleleaf species. Red fluorescence values were generally lower than those measured in the far-red region due to the reabsorption of FR by photosynthetic pigments within the canopy layers. Canopy chlorophyll fluorescence was related to plant photosynthetic capacity, but also varied according to leaf and canopy characteristics, such as leaf chlorophyll concentration and Leaf Area Index (LAI). Results gathered from field measurements were compared to radiative transfer model simulations with the Soil-Canopy Observation of Photochemistry and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model. Overall, simulation results confirmed a major contribution of leaf chlorophyll concentration and LAI to the fluorescence signal. However, some discrepancies between simulated and experimental data were found in broadleaf species. These discrepancies may be explained by uncertainties in individual species LAI estimation in mixed forests or by the effect of other model parameters and/or model representation errors. This is the first study showing sun-induced fluorescence experimental data on the variations in the two emission regions and providing quantitative information about the absolute magnitude of fluorescence emission from a range of vegetation types.
000817941 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000817941 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeroni, Michele$$b1
000817941 7001_ $$00000-0001-7249-7106$$aCelesti, Marco$$b2
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCogliati, Sergio$$b3
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJulitta, Tommaso$$b4
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPanigada, Cinzia$$b5
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, Uwe$$b6$$ufzj
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avan der Tol, Christiaan$$b7
000817941 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aColombo, Roberto$$b8
000817941 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2513863-7$$a10.3390/rs8050412$$gVol. 8, no. 5, p. 412 -$$n5$$p412 -$$tRemote sensing$$v8$$x2072-4292$$y2016
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000817941 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941/files/remotesensing-08-00412.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000817941 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:817941$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000817941 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000817941 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000817941 9141_ $$y2016
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000817941 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bREMOTE SENS-BASEL : 2015
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000817941 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000817941 920__ $$lyes
000817941 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000817941 980__ $$ajournal
000817941 980__ $$aVDB
000817941 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000817941 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000817941 9801_ $$aFullTexts