% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rossini:817941,
author = {Rossini, Micol and Meroni, Michele and Celesti, Marco and
Cogliati, Sergio and Julitta, Tommaso and Panigada, Cinzia
and Rascher, Uwe and van der Tol, Christiaan and Colombo,
Roberto},
title = {{A}nalysis of {R}ed and {F}ar-{R}ed {S}un-{I}nduced
{C}hlorophyll {F}luorescence and {T}heir {R}atio in
{D}ifferent {C}anopies {B}ased on {O}bserved and {M}odeled
{D}ata},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-04533},
pages = {412 -},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Sun-induced canopy chlorophyll fluorescence in both the red
(FR) and far-red (FFR) regions was estimated across a range
of temporal scales and a range of species from different
plant functional types using high resolution radiance
spectra collected on the ground. Field measurements were
collected with a state-of-the-art spectrometer setup and
standardized methodology. Results showed that different
plant species were characterized by different fluorescence
magnitude. In general, the highest fluorescence emissions
were measured in crops followed by broadleaf and then
needleleaf species. Red fluorescence values were generally
lower than those measured in the far-red region due to the
reabsorption of FR by photosynthetic pigments within the
canopy layers. Canopy chlorophyll fluorescence was related
to plant photosynthetic capacity, but also varied according
to leaf and canopy characteristics, such as leaf chlorophyll
concentration and Leaf Area Index (LAI). Results gathered
from field measurements were compared to radiative transfer
model simulations with the Soil-Canopy Observation of
Photochemistry and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model. Overall,
simulation results confirmed a major contribution of leaf
chlorophyll concentration and LAI to the fluorescence
signal. However, some discrepancies between simulated and
experimental data were found in broadleaf species. These
discrepancies may be explained by uncertainties in
individual species LAI estimation in mixed forests or by the
effect of other model parameters and/or model representation
errors. This is the first study showing sun-induced
fluorescence experimental data on the variations in the two
emission regions and providing quantitative information
about the absolute magnitude of fluorescence emission from a
range of vegetation types.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000378406400056},
doi = {10.3390/rs8050412},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/817941},
}