001     818271
005     20210129224126.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/hess-2016-226
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1812-2108
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1812-2116
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/13619
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:8284795
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-04745
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Andreasen, Mie
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Can canopy interception and biomass be inferred from cosmic-ray neutron intensity? Results from neutron transport modeling
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2016
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1485416406_32146
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Cosmic-ray neutron intensity is inversely correlated to all hydrogen present in the upper decimeters of the subsurface and the first few hectometers of the atmosphere above the ground surface. This method has been used for measuring soil moisture and snow water equivalent, but it may also be used to identify and quantify canopy interception and biomass. We use a neutron transport model with various representations of the forest and different parameters describing the subsurface to match measured profiles and time series of thermal and epithermal neutron intensities at a field site in Denmark. A sensitivity analysis is performed to quantify the effect of forest canopy representation, soil moisture, complexity of soil matrix chemistry, forest litter, soil bulk density, canopy interception and forest biomass on neutron intensity. The results show that forest biomass has a significant influence on the neutron intensity profiles at the examined field site, altering both the shape of the profiles and the ground level thermal-to-epithermal neutron ratio. The ground level thermal-to-epithermal neutron ratio increases significantly with increasing amounts of biomass and minor with canopy interception. Satisfactory agreement is found between measurements and model results at the forest site as well as two nearby sites representing agricultural and heathland ecosystems. The measured ground level thermal-to-epithermal neutron ratios of the three site range from around 0.56 to 0.82. The significantly smaller effect of canopy interception on the ground level thermal-to-epithermal neutron ratio was modeled to range from 0.804 to 0.836 for a forest with a dry and a very wet canopy (4 mm of canopy interception), respectively. At the examined field site the signal of the canopy interception is lower than the measurement uncertainty.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Jensen, Karsten H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Desilets, Darin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Zreda, Marek
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Bogena, Heye
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129440
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Looms, Majken C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/hess-2016-226
|g p. 1 - 42
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2190493-5
|p 1 - 42
|t Hydrology and earth system sciences discussions
|v
|y 2016
|x 1812-2116
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818271/files/hess-2016-226.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:818271
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129440
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21