000818316 001__ 818316
000818316 005__ 20210129224133.0
000818316 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.est.2015.12.006
000818316 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000391140500031
000818316 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-04788
000818316 082__ $$a333.7
000818316 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145405$$aStenzel, Peter$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000818316 245__ $$aPrimary control provided by large-scale battery energy storage systems or fossil power plants in Germany and related environmental impacts
000818316 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2016
000818316 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000818316 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000818316 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1481550506_18982
000818316 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000818316 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000818316 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000818316 520__ $$aIncreasing renewable energy generation influences the reliability of electric power grids. Thus, there is a demand for new technical units providing ancillary services. Non-dispatchable renewable energy sources can be balanced by energy storage devices. By large-scale battery energy storage systems (BESSs) grid efficiency and reliability as well as power quality can be increased. A further characteristic of BESSs is the ability to respond rapidly and precisely to frequency deviations, making them technical ideal candidates for primary control provision (PCP).In this paper environmental impacts of PCP by novel Li-ion BESSs are compared to impacts of PCP by state-of-the-art coal power plants (CPPs) using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach and considering German control market conditions. The coal power plant stock is characterized by varying properties. Thus, different scenarios of CPP operation are analyzed by varying sensitive parameters like efficiency loss and required must-run capacity. Finally, PCP by BESSs and CPPs are compared in terms of environmental performance. The more must-run electricity generation is attributable to PCP of CPPs, the higher are the environmental impacts of these CPPs. This leads to a better relative environmental performance of BESSs in most scenarios. Contrary, comparative or even better environmental performance of CPPs compared to state-of-the-art BESSs can solely be achieved if power plants without load restrictions for provision of primary control and with extreme low efficiency losses caused by PCP are applied. Consequently, the results of this paper indicate that BESSs are a promising option to reduce environmental impacts of primary control provision.
000818316 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$a153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)$$cPOF3-153$$fPOF III$$x0
000818316 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000818316 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aKoj, Jan Christian$$b1$$ufzj
000818316 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130483$$aSchreiber, Andrea$$b2$$ufzj
000818316 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130464$$aHennings, Wilfried$$b3$$ufzj
000818316 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aZapp, Petra$$b4$$ufzj
000818316 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2826805-2$$a10.1016/j.est.2015.12.006$$gp. S2352152X15300438$$p300-310$$tJournal of energy storage$$v8$$x2352-152X$$y2016
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000818316 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/818316/files/1-s2.0-S2352152X15300438-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000818316 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:818316$$pVDB
000818316 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145405$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000818316 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000818316 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130483$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000818316 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130464$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000818316 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130493$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000818316 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lTechnologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft$$vAssessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security$$x0
000818316 9141_ $$y2016
000818316 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000818316 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0112$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bEmerging Sources Citation Index
000818316 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000818316 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000818316 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000818316 920__ $$lyes
000818316 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000818316 980__ $$ajournal
000818316 980__ $$aVDB
000818316 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000818316 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013