% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Vilfan:819405,
author = {Vilfan, Nastassia and van der Tol, Christiaan and Muller,
Onno and Rascher, Uwe and Verhoef, Wouter},
title = {{F}luspect-{B}: {A} model for leaf fluorescence,
reflectance and transmittance spectra},
journal = {Remote sensing of environment},
volume = {186},
issn = {0034-4257},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-05093},
pages = {596 - 615},
year = {2016},
abstract = {We present the Fluspect-B model (generally referred to as
Fluspect), which simulates leaf chlorophyll fluorescence
(ChlF), reflectance and transmittance spectra. The existing
PROSPECT model and its concept of a compact leaf are used as
a starting point, and the differential equations for
radiative transfer within the leaf are solved by an
efficient doubling algorithm. Due to the simplicity of these
equations, Fluspect offers a high computational speed. With
incident light provided as the main input parameter,
Fluspect calculates the emission of ChlF on both the
illuminated and shaded side of the leaf. Other input
parameters are chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations,
leaf water, dry matter and senescent material (brown
pigments) content, leaf mesophyll structure parameter and
ChlF quantum efficiency for the two photosystems, PS-I and
PS-II. We investigated the model performance using
measurements of leaf reflectance, transmittance and ChlF
spectra, collected for barley and sugar beet leaves in both
a laboratory and outdoors setting. The plants had been grown
under various illumination conditions to increase
between-leaf variability of leaf biochemical and structural
properties. We retrieved the model parameters, compared them
to corresponding destructive measurements and finally, used
them to simulate ChlF on either side of the leaf at several
light intensities. The results show that the model
reproduces observed SIF accurately, especially for leaves
measured under natural illumination. Most of the observed
between-leaf variability of ChlF could be explained from
differences in leaf biochemical and structural properties,
with potential additional information held by ChlF emission
efficiency parameters.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {050},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000396382500045},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2016.09.017},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819405},
}