001     819629
005     20210129224322.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01524
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/12508
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000384171100003
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:11965339
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:27725815
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-05244
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Kramer, Susanne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Resource Partitioning between Bacteria, Fungi, and Protists in the Detritusphere of an Agricultural Soil
260 _ _ |a Lausanne
|c 2016
|b Frontiers Media
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1476167373_21565
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The flow of plant-derived carbon in soil is a key component of global carbon cycling. Conceptual models of trophic carbon fluxes in soil have assumed separate bacterial and fungal energy channels in the detritusphere, controlled by both substrate complexity and recalcitrance. However, detailed understanding of the key populations involved and niche-partitioning between them is limited. Here, a microcosm experiment was performed to trace the flow of detritusphere C from substrate analogs (glucose, cellulose) and plant biomass amendments (maize leaves, roots) in an agricultural soil. Carbon flow was traced by rRNA stable isotope probing and amplicon sequencing across three microbial kingdoms. Distinct lineages within the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Gammaproteobacteria, Basidiomycota, Ascomycota as well as Peronosporomycetes were identified as important primary substrate consumers. A dynamic succession of primary consumers was observed especially in the cellulose treatments, but also in plant amendments over time. While intra-kingdom niche partitioning was clearly observed, distinct bacterial and fungal energy channels were not apparent. Furthermore, while the diversity of primary substrate consumers did not notably increase with substrate complexity, consumer succession and secondary trophic links to bacterivorous and fungivorous microbes resulted in increased food web complexity in the more recalcitrant substrates. This suggests that rather than substrate-defined energy channels, consumer succession as well as intra- and inter-kingdom cross-feeding should be considered as mechanisms supporting food web complexity in the detritusphere.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|c POF3-899
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Dibbern, Dörte
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Moll, Julia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Huenninghaus, Maike
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Koller, Robert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165733
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Krueger, Dirk
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Marhan, Sven
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Urich, Tim
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Wubet, Tesfaye
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Bonkowski, Michael
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Buscot, François
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Lueders, Tillmann
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Kandeler, Ellen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
773 _ _ |a 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01524
|g Vol. 7
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2587354-4
|p 1524
|t Frontiers in microbiology
|v 7
|y 2016
|x 1664-302X
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/819629/files/fmicb-07-01524.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:819629
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165733
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FRONT MICROBIOL : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21