001     820456
005     20210129224505.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.002
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1360-1385
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1878-4372
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000389098000001
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:13411094
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:27810146
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-05766
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Tsaftaris, Sotirios A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Machine Learning for Plant Phenotyping Needs Image Processing
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2016
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1480490327_25247
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a We found the article by Singh et al. [1] extremely interesting because it introduces and showcases the utility of machine learning for high-throughput data-driven plant phenotyping. With this letter we aim to emphasize the role that image analysis and processing have in the phenotyping pipeline beyond what is suggested in [1], both in analyzing phenotyping data (e.g., to measure growth) and when providing effective feature extraction to be used by machine learning. Key recent reviews have shown that it is image analysis itself (what the authors of [1] consider as part of pre-processing) that has brought a renaissance in phenotyping [2]. At the same time, the lack of robust methods to analyze these images is now the new bottleneck 3, 4 and 5 – and this bottleneck is not easy to overcome. As the following aims to illustrate, it is coupled not only to the imaging system and the environment but also to the analytical task at hand, and requires new skills to help deal with the challenges introduced.A successful high-throughput image-based phenotyping system starts with the imaging approach itself. The choices are to image many plants simultaneously or one plant at a time, requiring movable systems to bring the plant to the camera or vice versa. These systems add cost but have the benefit of isolating the object of interest. In turn, this simplifies its processing, for example facilitating object segmentation, in other words the image analysis process isolating the plant from background (e.g., soil), as Figure 1A shows (many image-processing tasks are related to how we perceive and analyze an object of interest, such as segmentation, detection, tracking, and many others).
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Minervini, Massimo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Scharr, Hanno
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129394
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.10.002
|g p. S1360138516301613
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2011003-0
|n 12
|p 989–991
|t Trends in plant science
|v 21
|y 2016
|x 1360-1385
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.gif?subformat=icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820456/files/1-s2.0-S1360138516301613-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820456
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129394
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b TRENDS PLANT SCI : 2015
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b TRENDS PLANT SCI : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1120
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21