% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{DeRaedt:820467,
author = {De Raedt, Hans and Michielsen, Kristel and Hess, Karl},
title = {{T}he digital computer as a metaphor for the perfect
laboratory experiment: {L}oophole-free {B}ell experiments},
journal = {Computer physics communications},
volume = {209},
issn = {0010-4655},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {North Holland Publ. Co.},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-05777},
pages = {42 - 47},
year = {2016},
abstract = {Using Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments as an
example, we demonstrate that the combination of a digital
computer and algorithms, as a metaphor for a perfect
laboratory experiment, provides solutions to problems of the
foundations of physics. Employing discrete-event simulation,
we present a counterexample to John Bell’s remarkable
“proof” that any theory of physics, which is both
Einstein-local and “realistic” (counterfactually
definite), results in a strong upper bound to the
correlations that are being measured in
Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm experiments. Our
counterexample, which is free of the so-called detection-,
coincidence-, memory-, and contextuality loophole, violates
this upper bound and fully agrees with the predictions of
quantum theory for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm
experiments.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {004},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
(POF3-511)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000386743300005},
doi = {10.1016/j.cpc.2016.08.010},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820467},
}