000820509 001__ 820509
000820509 005__ 20240625095121.0
000820509 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01126
000820509 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1549-9618
000820509 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1549-9626
000820509 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000381320200059
000820509 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:9907572
000820509 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:27392273
000820509 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-05802
000820509 082__ $$a540
000820509 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGhaemi, Zhaleh$$b0
000820509 245__ $$aPermeability Coefficients of Lipophilic Compounds Estimated by Computer Simulations
000820509 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$c2016
000820509 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000820509 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000820509 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1478268823_17699
000820509 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000820509 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000820509 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000820509 520__ $$aThe ability of a drug to cross the intestine–blood barrier is a key quantity for drug design and employment and is normally quantified by the permeability coefficient P, often evaluated in the so-called Caco-2 assay. This assay is based on measuring the initial growth rate of the concentration of the drug beyond the cellular barrier but not its steady-state flux through the membrane. This might lead to confusion since, in the case of lipophilic drugs, the initial slope is strongly affected by the retention of the drug in the membrane. This effect is well known but seldom considered in the assay. Here, we exploit all-atoms molecular dynamics and bias exchange metadynamics to calculate the concentration of two lipophilic drugs across a model membrane as a function of time. This allows estimating both the steady-state flux and the initial slope of the concentration growth and comparing Caco-2 and steady-state estimates of P. We show that our computational procedure is able to reproduce the experimental values, although these may differ from the permeability coefficients by orders of magnitude. Our findings are generalized by a simplified one-dimensional model of the permeation process that may act as a roadmap to assess which measure of membrane permeability would be more appropriate and, consequently, whether retention corrections should be included in estimates based on Caco-2 assays.
000820509 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)$$cPOF3-899$$fPOF III$$x0
000820509 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000820509 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAlberga, Domenico$$b1
000820509 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145614$$aCarloni, Paolo$$b2
000820509 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLaio, Alessandro$$b3
000820509 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLattanzi, Gianluca$$b4$$eCorresponding author
000820509 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2166976-4$$a10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01126$$gVol. 12, no. 8, p. 4093 - 4099$$n8$$p4093 - 4099$$tJournal of chemical theory and computation$$v12$$x1549-9626$$y2016
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.pdf$$yRestricted
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000820509 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820509/files/acs.jctc.5b01126.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000820509 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820509$$pVDB
000820509 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145614$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000820509 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000820509 9141_ $$y2016
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ CHEM THEORY COMPUT : 2015
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bJ CHEM THEORY COMPUT : 2015
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000820509 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000820509 920__ $$lyes
000820509 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330$$kIAS-5$$lComputational Biomedicine$$x0
000820509 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121$$kINM-9$$lComputational Biomedicine$$x1
000820509 980__ $$ajournal
000820509 980__ $$aVDB
000820509 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000820509 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330
000820509 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121
000820509 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121