000820750 001__ 820750
000820750 005__ 20210129224609.0
000820750 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/bg-2016-410
000820750 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1810-6277
000820750 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1810-6285
000820750 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/13623
000820750 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:12435809
000820750 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-06017
000820750 082__ $$a570
000820750 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aRothfuss, Youri$$b0$$ufzj
000820750 245__ $$aIsotopic approaches to quantifying root water uptake and redistribution: a review and comparison of methods
000820750 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]$$bCopernicus$$c2016
000820750 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000820750 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000820750 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1485418310_32137
000820750 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000820750 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000820750 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000820750 520__ $$aPlant root water uptake (RWU) and release (i.e., hydraulic redistribution – HR, and its particular case hydraulic lift – HL) have been documented for the past five decades from water stable isotopic analysis. By comparing the (hydrogen or oxygen) stable isotopic composition of plant xylem water to those of potential contributive water sources (e.g., water from different soil layers, groundwater, water from recent precipitation or from a nearby stream) authors could determine the relative contributions of these water sources to RWU. Other authors have confirmed the existence of HR and HL from the isotopic analysis of the plant xylem water following a labelling pulse. In this paper, the different methods used for locating / quantifying relative contributions of water sources to RWU (i.e., graphical inference, statistical (e.g., Bayesian) multi-source linear mixing models) are reviewed with emphasis on their respective advantages and drawbacks. The graphical and statistical methods are tested against a physically based analytical RWU model during a series of virtual experiments differing in the depth of the groundwater table, the soil surface water status, and the plant transpiration rate value. The benchmarking of these methods illustrates the limitations of the graphical and statistical methods (e.g., their inability to locate or quantify HR) while it underlines the performance of one Bayesian mixing model, but only when the number of considered water sources in the soil is the highest to closely reflect the vertical distribution of the soil water isotopic composition. The simplest two end-member mixing model is also successfully tested when all possible sources in the soil can be identified to define the two end-members and compute their isotopic compositions. Finally, future challenges in studying RWU with stable isotopic analysis are evocated with focus on new isotopic monitoring methods and sampling strategies, and on the implementation of isotope transport in physically based RWU models.
000820750 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000820750 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000820750 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aJavaux, Mathieu$$b1
000820750 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2146550-2$$a10.5194/bg-2016-410$$gp. 1 - 47$$p $$tBiogeosciences discussions$$v $$x1810-6285$$y2016
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000820750 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820750/files/Rothfuss_Javaux_2016_bg-2016-410.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000820750 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820750$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000820750 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000820750 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000820750 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000820750 9141_ $$y2016
000820750 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000820750 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000820750 920__ $$lyes
000820750 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000820750 980__ $$ajournal
000820750 980__ $$aVDB
000820750 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000820750 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000820750 9801_ $$aFullTexts