001     820885
005     20210129224637.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.jag.2015.09.011
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:000372682300006
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:7982416
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-06149
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Sakai, Toru
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Varying applicability of four different satellite-derived soil moisture products to global gridded crop model evaluation
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2016
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1479130759_4508
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Satellite-derived daily surface soil moisture products have been increasingly available, but their applicability to global gridded crop model (GGCM) evaluation is unclear. This study compares four different soil moisture products with the flux tower site observation at 18 cropland sites across the world where either of maize, soybean, rice and wheat is grown. These products include the first and second versions of Climate Change Initiative Soil Moisture (CCISM-1 and CCISM-2) datasets distributed by the European Space Agency and two different AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer–Earth Observing System)-derived soil moisture datasets, separately provided by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (AMSRE-J) and U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (AMSRE-N). The comparison demonstrates varying reliability of these products in representing major characteristics of temporal pattern of cropland soil moisture by product and crop. Possible reasons for the varying reliability include the differences in sensors, algorithms, bands and criteria used when estimating soil moisture. Both the CCISM-1 and CCISM-2 products appear the most reliable for soybean- and wheat-growing area. However, the percentage of valid data of these products is always lower than other products due to relatively strict criteria when merging data derived from multiple sources, although the CCISM-2 product has much more data with valid retrievals than the CCISM-1 product. The reliability of the AMSRE-J product is the highest for maize- and rice-growing areas and comparable to or slightly lower than the CCISM products for soybean- and wheat-growing areas. The AMSRE-N is the least reliable in most location-crop combinations. The reliability of the products for rice-growing area is far lower than that of other upland crops likely due to the extensive use of irrigation and patch distribution of rice paddy in the area examined here. We conclude that the CCISM-1, CCISM-2 and AMSRE-J products are applicable to GGCM evaluation, while the AMSRE-N product is not. However, we encourage users to integrate these products with in situ soil moisture data especially when GGCMs simulations for rice are evaluated.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Iizumi, Toshichika
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Okada, Masashi
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Nishimori, Motoki
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Grünwald, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Prueger, John
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Cescatti, Alessandro
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Korres, Wolfgang
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Schmidt, Marius
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144420
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Carrara, Arnaud
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Loubet, Benjamin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Ceschia, Eric
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.jag.2015.09.011
|g Vol. 48, p. 51 - 60
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2097960-5
|p 51 - 60
|t International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation
|v 48
|y 2016
|x 0303-2434
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820885/files/1-s2.0-S0303243415300349-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820885
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144420
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b INT J APPL EARTH OBS : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21