% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ferguson:820889,
      author       = {Ferguson, Ian M. and Jefferson, Jennifer L. and Maxwell,
                      Reed M. and Kollet, Stefan},
      title        = {{E}ffects of root water uptake formulation on simulated
                      water and energy budgets at local and basin scales},
      journal      = {Environmental earth sciences},
      volume       = {75},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1866-6299},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2016-06153},
      pages        = {316},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {Roots connect water stored beneath the Earth’s surface to
                      water in the atmosphere. The fully integrated hydrologic
                      model ParFlow coupled to the Common Land Model is used to
                      investigate the influence of the root uptake formulation on
                      simulated water and energy fluxes and budgets at local and
                      watershed scales. The effects of four functional
                      representations of vegetation water stress and plant wilting
                      behavior are evaluated in the semi-arid Little Washita
                      watershed of the Southern Great Plains, USA. Monthly mean
                      latent and sensible heat fluxes differ by more than 25 W
                      m−2 over much of the study area during hot, dry summer
                      conditions. This difference indicates that the root uptake
                      formulation has a substantial impact on simulated land
                      energy fluxes and land–atmosphere interactions.
                      Differences in annual evapotranspiration and stream
                      discharge over the watershed exceed 14.5 and 55.5 $\%$
                      between simulations, respectively, demonstrating significant
                      impacts on simulated water budgets. Notably, the analysis
                      reveals that spatial variability in the sensitivity of
                      local-scale water and energy fluxes to root uptake
                      formulation is primarily driven by feedbacks between water
                      table dynamics, soil moisture, and land energy fluxes. These
                      results have important implications for model development,
                      calibration, and validation.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
                      (POF3-255)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000371393400038},
      doi          = {10.1007/s12665-015-5041-z},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820889},
}