000820896 001__ 820896
000820896 005__ 20210129224642.0
000820896 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1021/acs.est.6b03285
000820896 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0013-936X
000820896 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1520-5851
000820896 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000389557100022
000820896 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-06160
000820896 082__ $$a050
000820896 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156270$$aZhang, Miaoyue$$b0
000820896 245__ $$aDo Goethite Surfaces Really Control the Transport and Retention of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Chemically Heterogeneous Porous Media?
000820896 260__ $$aColumbus, Ohio$$bAmerican Chemical Society$$c2016
000820896 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000820896 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000820896 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1481100012_4425
000820896 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000820896 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000820896 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000820896 520__ $$aTransport and retention behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was studied in mixtures of negatively charged quartz sand (QS) and positively charged goethite-coated sand (GQS) to assess the role of chemical heterogeneity. The linear equilibrium sorption model provided a good description of batch results, and the distribution coefficients (KD) drastically increased with the GQS fraction that was electrostatically favorable for retention. Similarly, retention of MWCNTs increased with the GQS fraction in packed column experiments. However, calculated values of KD on GQS were around 2 orders of magnitude smaller in batch than packed column experiments due to differences in lever arms associated with hydrodynamic and adhesive torques at microscopic roughness locations. Furthermore, the fraction of the sand surface area that was favorable for retention (Sf) was much smaller than the GQS fraction because nanoscale roughness produced shallow interactions that were susceptible to removal. These observations indicate that only a minor fraction of the GQS was favorable for MWCNT retention. These same observations held for several different sand sizes. Column breakthrough curves were always well described using an advective-dispersive transport model that included retention and blocking. However, depth-dependent retention also needed to be included to accurately describe the retention profile when the GQS fraction was small. Results from this research indicate that roughness primarily controlled the retention of MWCNTs, although goethite surfaces played an important secondary role.
000820896 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000820896 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000820896 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBradford, Scott A.$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000820896 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aŠimůnek, Jirka$$b2
000820896 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b3
000820896 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129484$$aKlumpp, Erwin$$b4
000820896 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1465132-4$$a10.1021/acs.est.6b03285$$gp. acs.est.6b03285$$n23$$p12713–12721$$tEnvironmental science & technology$$v50$$x1520-5851$$y2016
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.pdf$$yRestricted
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000820896 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820896/files/acs.est.6b03285.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000820896 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820896$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000820896 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156270$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000820896 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000820896 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129484$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000820896 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000820896 9141_ $$y2016
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENVIRON SCI TECHNOL : 2015
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bENVIRON SCI TECHNOL : 2015
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000820896 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000820896 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000820896 980__ $$ajournal
000820896 980__ $$aVDB
000820896 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000820896 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118