000820898 001__ 820898
000820898 005__ 20220930130109.0
000820898 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.026
000820898 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0045-6535
000820898 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-1298
000820898 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000369196300022
000820898 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/18652
000820898 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-06162
000820898 082__ $$a333.7
000820898 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKarlsson, Anneli Sofia$$b0
000820898 245__ $$aField scale boscalid residues and dissipation half-life estimation in a sandy soil
000820898 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2016
000820898 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000820898 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000820898 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1527072297_10479
000820898 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000820898 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000820898 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000820898 520__ $$aThe aim of this study was to analyze the environmental fate of the fungicide boscalid in a sandy soil. Boscalid was applied in spring 2010/11 to a cropland site in western Germany. Three years after second application 65 undisturbed soil samples were taken. Boscalid was extracted using accelerated solvent extraction (ASE). Boscalid contents in the plough horizon ranged between 0.12 and 0.53 with a field mean of 0.20 ± 0.09 μg kg−1. These contents were considerably lower compared to calculation using literature DT50 values, whereby a concentration of 16.89 μg kg−1 was expected assuming a literature DT50 value of 345 days. Therefore, the measured field boscalid concentration only yields 1.2% of the expected value. To test whether the unknown extraction efficiency, losses from spray drift and interception can explain the mismatch between calculated and measured concentrations all these uncertainties were taken into account into calculations, but field concentrations and DT50 were still lower as expected. Leaching to deeper horizons was also studied but could not explain the discrepancy either. Moreover, a short-term incubation experiment using 14C labelled boscalid revealed also shorter DT50 values of 297–337 compared to the 345 days taken from literature. However, this DT50 value is still considerably larger compared to the 104–224 days that were calculated based on the field experiment. Our results indicate that boscalid dissipation under field conditions is much faster at agricultural sites with sandy soil type as expected from laboratory incubation experiments.
000820898 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000820898 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000820898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aWeihermüller, Lutz$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000820898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129545$$aTappe, Wolfgang$$b2
000820898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145606$$aMukherjee, Santanu$$b3
000820898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSpielvogel, Sandra$$b4
000820898 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1496851-4$$a10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.026$$gVol. 145, p. 163 - 173$$p163 - 173$$tChemosphere$$v145$$x0045-6535$$y2016
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/1-s2.0-S0045653515303593-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820898/files/Boscalid_in_field_soil_revision.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000820898 8767_ $$811600346$$92015-11-25$$d2016-01-05$$eColour charges$$jZahlung erfolgt
000820898 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820898$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000820898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000820898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129545$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000820898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145606$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000820898 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000820898 9141_ $$y2016
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCHEMOSPHERE : 2015
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000820898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000820898 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000820898 980__ $$ajournal
000820898 980__ $$aVDB
000820898 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000820898 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000820898 980__ $$aAPC
000820898 9801_ $$aAPC
000820898 9801_ $$aFullTexts