guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Soil apparent conductivity measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments: A case study from Western-Thailand > print |
| Home > Publications database > Soil apparent conductivity measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments: A case study from Western-Thailand > print |
| 001 | 820901 | ||
| 005 | 20220930130109.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.013 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0016-7061 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1872-6259 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000369473100024 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:5011121 |2 altmetric |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2016-06165 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Rudolph, S. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Soil apparent conductivity measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments: A case study from Western-Thailand |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2016 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1479132710_4507 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a In experimental trials, the success or failure of agricultural improvements is commonly evaluated on the agronomic response of crops, using proper experimental designs with sufficient statistical power. Since fine-scale variability of the experimental site can reduce statistical power, efficiency gains in the experimental design can be achieved if this variation is known and used to design blocking, or some proxy variable is used as a covariate. Near-surface geophysical techniques such as electromagnetic induction (EMI), which describes subsurface properties non-invasively by measuring soil apparent conductivity (ECa), may be one source of this information. The motivation of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of EMI-derived ECa measurements for planning and analysis of agricultural experiments. ECa and plant height measurements (the response variable) were taken from an agroforestry experiment in Western Thailand, and their variability was quantified to simulate multiple realizations of ECa and the residuals of the response variable from treatment means. These were combined to produce simulated data from different experimental designs and treatment effects. The simulated data were then used to evaluate the statistical power by detecting three orthogonal contrasts among the treatments in the original experiment. We considered three experimental designs, a simple random design (SR), a complete randomized block design (CRB), and a complete randomized block design with spatially adjusted blocks on plot means of ECa (CRBECa). Using analysis of variance (ANOVA), the smallest effect sizes could be detected with the CRBECa design, which indicates that ECa measurements could be used in the planning phase of an experiment to achieve efficiencies by improved blocking. In contrast, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) demonstrated that substantial power improvements could be gained when ECa was considered as a covariate in the analysis. We therefore recommend that ECa measurements should be used to characterize subsurface variability of experimental sites and to support the statistical analysis of agricultural experiments. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Wongleecharoen, C. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lark, R. M. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Marchant, B. P. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Garré, S. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129457 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Herbst, M. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129469 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vereecken, H. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Weihermüller, L. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129553 |b 7 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.013 |g Vol. 267, p. 220 - 229 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7 |p 220 - 229 |t Geoderma |v 267 |y 2016 |x 0016-7061 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.pdf |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.gif?subformat=icon |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-1440 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-180 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-640 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820901/files/1-s2.0-S0016706115301646-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa |y Restricted |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820901 |p OpenAPC |p VDB |p VDB:Earth_Environment |p openCost |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129457 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129469 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 7 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129553 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2016 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a No Authors Fulltext |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b GEODERMA : 2015 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|