guest ::
| Home > Publications database > The impact of sieving on heterotrophic respiration response to water content in loamy and sandy topsoils > print |
| Home > Publications database > The impact of sieving on heterotrophic respiration response to water content in loamy and sandy topsoils > print |
| 001 | 820906 | ||
| 005 | 20210129224645.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.002 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0016-7061 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1872-6259 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000374077500008 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/18671 |2 Handle |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2016-06170 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Herbst, M. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129469 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a The impact of sieving on heterotrophic respiration response to water content in loamy and sandy topsoils |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2016 |b Elsevier Science |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1527160002_26354 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Understanding the relation between soil heterotrophic respiration and water content is important for the prediction of climate change effects on soil CO2 emissions. In order to quantify the influence of air-drying and sieving with 2 mm meshes on the heterotrophic respiration response to soil water content we incubated intact cores and sieved samples of two loamy and two sandy soils for six levels of effective soil water saturation. We further determined soil textural properties and the soil water retention curves of the soils with the intent to identify links between soil physical characteristics and moisture sensitivity functions of heterotrophic respiration. The incubation of sieved and intact soils revealed distinct differences in the response of heterotrophic respiration to soil water content. The sieved soils exposed a threshold-type behaviour, whereas the undisturbed soils exposed a quadratic increase of heterotrophic respiration with increasing effective soil water saturation. Further, we detected significant correlations between the moisture response functions of the undisturbed soils and soil texture. From the comparison of sieved and intact soil incubations we conclude that the destruction of soil structure by sieving hampers the transferability of measured soil moisture response of heterotrophic respiration to real-world conditions. For modelling purposes we suggest the use of a quadratic function between relative respiration and effective saturation for soils with a clay fraction < 20%. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Tappe, W. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129545 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kummer, S. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129488 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vereecken, H. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |b 3 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.03.002 |g Vol. 272, p. 73 - 82 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2001729-7 |p 73 - 82 |t Geoderma |v 272 |y 2016 |x 0016-7061 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.pdf |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.gif?subformat=icon |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-1440 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-180 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x icon-640 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/1-s2.0-S0016706116301008-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/postprint_geoderma_2016_herbst.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/postprint_geoderma_2016_herbst.gif?subformat=icon |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-1440 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/postprint_geoderma_2016_herbst.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-180 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/postprint_geoderma_2016_herbst.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x icon-640 |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820906/files/postprint_geoderma_2016_herbst.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820906 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB:Earth_Environment |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129469 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129545 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129488 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2016 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b GEODERMA : 2015 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a No Authors Fulltext |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|