% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Andreasen:820927,
author = {Andreasen, Mie and Jensen, Karsten H. and Zreda, Marek and
Desilets, Darin and Bogena, Heye and Looms, Majken C.},
title = {{M}odeling cosmic ray neutron field measurements},
journal = {Water resources research},
volume = {52},
number = {8},
issn = {0043-1397},
address = {[New York]},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-06191},
pages = {6451 - 6471},
year = {2016},
abstract = {The cosmic ray neutron method was developed for
intermediate-scale soil moisture detection, but may
potentially be used for other hydrological applications. The
neutron signal of different hydrogen pools is poorly
understood and separating them is difficult based on neutron
measurements alone. Including neutron transport modeling may
accommodate this shortcoming. However, measured and modeled
neutrons are not directly comparable. Neither the scale nor
energy ranges are equivalent, and the exact neutron energy
sensitivity of the detectors is unknown. Here a methodology
to enable comparability of the measured and modeled neutrons
is presented. The usual cosmic ray soil moisture detector
measures moderated neutrons by means of a proportional
counter surrounded by plastic, making it sensitive to
epithermal neutrons. However, that configuration allows for
some thermal neutrons to be measured. The thermal
contribution can be removed by surrounding the plastic with
a layer of cadmium, which absorbs neutrons with energies
below 0.5 eV. Likewise, cadmium shielding of a bare detector
allows for estimating the epithermal contribution. First,
the cadmium difference method is used to determine the
fraction of thermal and epithermal neutrons measured by the
bare and plastic-shielded detectors, respectively. The
cadmium difference method results in linear correction
models for measurements by the two detectors, and has the
greatest impact on the neutron intensity measured by the
moderated detector at the ground surface. Next, conversion
factors are obtained relating measured and modeled neutron
intensities. Finally, the methodology is tested by modeling
the neutron profiles at an agricultural field site and
satisfactory agreement to measurements is found.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000383684400042},
doi = {10.1002/2015WR018236},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820927},
}