001     820930
005     20210129224654.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1093/aob/mcw154
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0003-4754
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0305-7364
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1095-8290
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000386487600025
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:10723695
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:27539602
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-06194
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Zarebanadkouki, Mohsen
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Estimation of the hydraulic conductivities of lupine roots by inverse modelling of high-resolution measurements of root water uptake
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|c 2016
|b Oxford University Press
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1479137696_4501
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Background and Aims Radial and axial hydraulic conductivities are key parameters for proper understanding and modelling of root water uptake. Despite their importance, there is limited experimental information on how the radial and axial hydraulic conductivities vary along roots growing in soil. Here, a new approach was introduced to estimate inversely the profile of hydraulic conductivities along the roots of transpiring plants growing in soil.Methods A three-dimensional model of root water uptake was used to reproduce the measured profile of root water uptake along roots of lupine plant grown in soil. The profile of fluxes was measured using a neutron radiography technique combined with injection of deuterated water as tracer. The aim was to estimate inversely the profiles of the radial and axial hydraulic conductivities along the roots.Key Results The profile of hydraulic conductivities along the taproot and the lateral roots of lupines was calculated using three flexible scenarios. For all scenarios, it was found that the radial hydraulic conductivity increases towards the root tips, while the axial conductivity decreases. Additionally, it was found that in soil with uniform water content: (1) lateral roots were the main location of root water uptake; (2) water uptake by laterals decreased towards the root tips due to the dissipation of water potential along the root; and (3) water uptake by the taproot was higher in the distal segments and was negligible in the proximal parts, which had a low radial conductivity.Conclusions The proposed approach allows the estimation of the root hydraulic properties of plants growing in soil. This information can be used in an advanced model of water uptake to predict the water uptake of different root types or different root architectures under varying soil conditions.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Meunier, Félicien
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Couvreur, Valentin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Cesar, Jimenez
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Javaux, Mathieu
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129477
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Carminati, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/aob/mcw154
|g Vol. 118, no. 4, p. 853 - 864
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1461328-1
|n 4
|p 853 - 864
|t Annals of botany
|v 118
|y 2016
|x 1095-8290
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.gif?subformat=icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/820930/files/Ann%20Bot-2016-Zarebanadkouki-853-64.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:820930
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129477
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ANN BOT-LONDON : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21