% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sawicki:824545,
author = {Sawicki, Lino M. and Buchbender, Christian and Boos,
Johannes and Giessing, Markus and Ermert, Johannes and
Antke, Christina and Antoch, Gerald and Hautzel, Hubertus},
title = {{D}iagnostic potential of {PET}/{CT} using a
$^{68}${G}a-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen
ligand in whole-body staging of renal cell carcinoma:
initial experience},
journal = {European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging},
volume = {44},
number = {1},
issn = {1619-7089},
address = {Heidelberg [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer-Verl.},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-07117},
pages = {102 - 107},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic potential of
whole-bodyPET/CT using a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand in renal
cell carcinoma(RCC).Methods Six patients with
histopathologically proven RCCunderwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT.
Each PET/CT scan wasevaluated in relation to lesion count,
location and dignity.SUVmax was measured in primary tumours
and PETpositivemetastases. Tumour-to-background SUVmax
ratios(TBRSUVmax) were calculated for primary RCCs in
relationto the surrounding normal renal parenchyma.
Metastasis-tobackgroundSUVmax ratios (MBRSUVmax) were
calculatedfor PET-positive metastases in relation to gluteal
muscle.Results Five primary RCCs and 16 metastases were
evaluated.The mean SUVmax of the primary RCCs was 9.9 ±
9.2(range 1.7 – 27.2). Due to high uptake in the
surrounding renalparenchyma, the mean TBRSUVmax of the
primary RCCs wasonly 0.2 ± 0.3 (range 0.02 – 0.7). Eight
metastases showed focal68Ga-PSMA uptake (SUVmax 9.9 ± 8.3,
range 3.4 – 25.6).The mean MBRSUVmax of these PET-positive
metastases was11.7 ± 0.2 (range 4.4 – 28.1). All
PET-negative metastaseswere subcentimetre lung
metastases.Conclusion 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT appears to be a
promisingmethod for detecting RCC metastases. However, no
additionaldiagnostic value in assessing the primary tumour
was found.},
cin = {INM-5 / KME},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)VDB145},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000389242200013},
pubmed = {pmid:26996777},
doi = {10.1007/s00259-016-3360-2},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/824545},
}