% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{WeissLucas:825814,
      author       = {Weiss Lucas, Carolin and Tursunova, Irada and
                      Neuschmelting, Volker and Nettekoven, Charlotte and
                      Oros-Peusquens, Ana-Maria and Stoffels, Gabriele and
                      Faymonville, Andrea Maria and Shah, N. J. and Langen, Karl
                      Josef and Lockau, Hannah and Goldbrunner, Roland and
                      Grefkes, Christian},
      title        = {{F}unctional {MRI} vs. navigated {TMS} to optimize {M}1
                      seed volume delineation for {DTI} tractography. {A}
                      prospective study in patients with brain tumours adjacent to
                      the corticospinal tract},
      journal      = {NeuroImage: Clinical},
      volume       = {13},
      issn         = {2213-1582},
      address      = {[Amsterdam u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-00116},
      pages        = {297 - 309},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {DTI-based tractography is an increasingly important tool
                      for planning brain surgery in patients suffering from brain
                      tumours. However, there is an ongoing debate which tracking
                      approaches yield the most valid results. Especially the use
                      of functional localizer data such as navigated transcranial
                      magnetic stimulation (nTMS) or functional magnetic resonance
                      imaging (fMRI) seem to improve fibre tracking data in
                      conditions where anatomical landmarks are less informative
                      due to tumour-induced distortions of the gyral anatomy. We
                      here compared which of the two localizer techniques yields
                      more plausible results with respect to mapping different
                      functional portions of the corticospinal tract (CST) in
                      brain tumour patients.},
      cin          = {INM-4 / INM-3 / JARA-BRAIN},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 /
                      $I:(DE-82)080010_20140620$},
      pnm          = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000401413700036},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.022},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825814},
}