Home > Publications database > Dynamic O -(2-$^{18}$ F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy > print |
001 | 825818 | ||
005 | 20220930130113.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1093/neuonc/now149 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1522-8517 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1523-5866 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000397280500015 |2 WOS |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:10108548 |2 altmetric |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:27471107 |2 pmid |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2017-00120 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Ceccon, Garry |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |
245 | _ | _ | |a Dynamic O -(2-$^{18}$ F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy |
260 | _ | _ | |a Oxford |c 2017 |b Oxford Univ. Press |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1492774582_23541 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential of dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for differentiating local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation injury after radiotherapy since contrast-enhanced MRI often remains inconclusive.MethodsSixty-two patients (mean age, 55 ± 11 y) with single or multiple contrast-enhancing brain lesions (n = 76) on MRI after radiotherapy of brain metastases (predominantly stereotactic radiosurgery) were investigated with dynamic 18F-FET PET. Maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) of 18F-FET uptake were determined (20–40 min postinjection) as well as tracer uptake kinetics (ie, time-to-peak and slope of time-activity curves). Diagnoses were confirmed histologically (34%; 26 lesions in 25 patients) or by clinical follow-up (66%; 50 lesions in 37 patients). Diagnostic accuracies of PET parameters for the correct identification of recurrent brain metastasis were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or the chi-square test.ResultsTBRs were significantly higher in recurrent metastases (n = 36) than in radiation injuries (n = 40) (TBRmax 3.3 ± 1.0 vs 2.2 ± 0.4, P < .001; TBRmean 2.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.3, P < .001). The highest accuracy (88%) for diagnosing local recurrent metastasis could be obtained with TBRs in combination with the slope of time-activity curves (P < .001).ConclusionsThe results of this study confirm previous preliminary observations that the combined evaluation of the TBRs of 18F-FET uptake and the slope of time-activity curves can differentiate local brain metastasis recurrence from radiation-induced changes with high accuracy. 18F-FET PET may thus contribute significantly to the management of patients with brain metastases. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573 |c POF3-573 |f POF III |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Lohmann, Philipp |0 P:(DE-Juel1)145110 |b 1 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Stoffels, Gabriele |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131627 |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Judov, Natalie |0 P:(DE-Juel1)143958 |b 3 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Filss, Christian |0 P:(DE-Juel1)141877 |b 4 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Rapp, Marion |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Bauer, Elena |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Hamisch, Christina |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Ruge, Maximilian I. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kocher, Martin |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 9 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Kuchelmeister, Klaus |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 10 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Sellhaus, Bernd |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 11 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Sabel, Michael |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165921 |b 12 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Fink, Gereon R. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |b 13 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Shah, Nadim J. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |b 14 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Langen, Karl-Josef |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |b 15 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Galldiks, Norbert |0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792 |b 16 |e Corresponding author |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1093/neuonc/now149 |g p. now149 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2094060-9 |n 2 |p 281-288 |t Neuro-Oncology |v 19 |y 2017 |x 1523-5866 |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.pdf |y Restricted |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.gif?subformat=icon |x icon |y Restricted |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |x icon-1440 |y Restricted |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |x icon-180 |y Restricted |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |x icon-640 |y Restricted |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825818/files/now149.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |y Restricted |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:825818 |p VDB |p OpenAPC |p openCost |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)145110 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131627 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)143958 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)141877 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 13 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 14 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131794 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 15 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 16 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v Neuroimaging |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2017 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b NEURO-ONCOLOGY : 2015 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b NEURO-ONCOLOGY : 2015 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |k INM-3 |l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften |x 0 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |k INM-4 |l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung |x 1 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-82)080010_20140620 |k JARA-BRAIN |l JARA-BRAIN |x 2 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-82)080010_20140620 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|