% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Lennartz:825963,
      author       = {Lennartz, Sinikka T. and Marandino, Christa A. and von
                      Hobe, Marc and Cortes, Pau and Quack, Birgit and Simo, Rafel
                      and Booge, Dennis and Pozzer, Andrea and Steinhoff, Tobias
                      and Arevalo-Martinez, Damian L. and Kloss, Corinna and
                      Bracher, Astrid and Röttgers, Rüdiger and Atlas, Elliot
                      and Krüger, Kirstin},
      title        = {{D}irect oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the
                      missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide},
      journal      = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
      volume       = {17},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1680-7324},
      address      = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
      publisher    = {EGU},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-00235},
      pages        = {385 - 402},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {The climate active trace-gas carbonyl sulfide (OCS) is the
                      most abundant sulfur gas in the atmosphere. A missing source
                      in its atmospheric budget is currently suggested, resulting
                      from an upward revision of the vegetation sink. Tropical
                      oceanic emissions have been proposed to close the resulting
                      gap in the atmospheric budget. We present a bottom-up
                      approach including (i) new observations of OCS in surface
                      waters of the tropical Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans
                      and (ii) a further improved global box model to show that
                      direct OCS emissions are unlikely to account for the missing
                      source. The box model suggests an undersaturation of the
                      surface water with respect to OCS integrated over the entire
                      tropical ocean area and, further, global annual direct
                      emissions of OCS well below that suggested by top-down
                      estimates. In addition, we discuss the potential of indirect
                      emission from CS2 and dimethylsulfide (DMS) to account for
                      the gap in the atmospheric budget. This bottom-up estimate
                      of oceanic emissions has implications for using OCS as a
                      proxy for global terrestrial CO2 uptake, which is currently
                      impeded by the inadequate quantification of atmospheric OCS
                      sources and sinks.},
      cin          = {IEK-7},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013},
      pnm          = {244 - Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and
                      middle atmosphere (POF3-244) / HITEC - Helmholtz
                      Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate
                      Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244 / G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000393756100001},
      doi          = {10.5194/acp-17-385-2017},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825963},
}