001     825993
005     20240712112956.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0306-2619
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-9118
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/14819
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000403418200024
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:21832130
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-00265
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Reuss, Markus
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168335
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain architecture model
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2017
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1604409687_593
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a A viable hydrogen infrastructure is one of the main challenges for fuel cells in mobile applications. Several studies have investigated the most cost-efficient hydrogen supply chain structure, with a focus on hydrogen transportation. However, supply chain models based on hydrogen produced by electrolysis require additional seasonal hydrogen storage capacity to close the gap between fluctuation in renewable generation from surplus electricity and fuelling station demand. To address this issue, we developed a model that draws on and extends approaches in the literature with respect to long-term storage. Thus, we analyse Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers (LOHC) and show their potential impact on future hydrogen mobility. We demonstrate that LOHC-based pathways are highly promising especially for smaller-scale hydrogen demand and if storage in salt caverns remains uncompetitive, but emit more greenhouse gases (GHG) than other gaseous or hydrogen ones. Liquid hydrogen as a seasonal storage medium offers no advantage compared to LOHC or cavern storage since lower electricity prices for flexible operation cannot balance the investment costs of liquefaction plants. A well-to-wheel analysis indicates that all investigated pathways have less than 30% GHG-emissions compared to conventional fossil fuel pathways within a European framework
536 _ _ |a 134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|c POF3-134
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a ES2050 - Energie Sytem 2050 (ES2050)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)ES2050
|c ES2050
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Grube, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129852
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Robinius, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Preuster, Patrick
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Wasserscheid, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162305
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Stolten, Detlef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050
|g Vol. 200, p. 290 - 302
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2000772-3
|p 290 - 302
|t Applied energy
|v 200
|y 2017
|x 0306-2619
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/825993/files/1-s2.0-S0306261917305457-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:825993
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168335
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129852
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156460
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162305
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Electrolysis and Hydrogen
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b APPL ENERG : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Technoökonomische Systemanalyse
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314
|k IEK-11
|l Helmholtz-Institut Erlangen-Nürnberg Erneuerbare Energien
|x 1
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-2-20140314
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-2-20140314


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21