% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Tan:826194,
author = {Tan, Zhaofeng and Fuchs, Hendrik and Lu, Keding and
Hofzumahaus, Andreas and Bohn, Birger and Broch, Sebastian
and Dong, Huabin and Gomm, Sebastian and Häseler, Rolf and
He, Lingyan and Holland, Frank and Li, Xin and Liu, Ying and
Lu, Sihua and Rohrer, Franz and Shao, Min and Wang, Baolin
and Wang, Ming and Wu, Yusheng and Zeng, Limin and Zhang,
Yinsong and Wahner, Andreas and Zhang, Yuanhang},
title = {{R}adical chemistry at a rural site ({W}angdu) in the
{N}orth {C}hina {P}lain: observation and model calculations
of {OH}, {HO}2 and {RO}2 radicals},
journal = {Atmospheric chemistry and physics},
volume = {17},
number = {1},
issn = {1680-7324},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {EGU},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-00440},
pages = {663 - 690},
year = {2017},
abstract = {comprehensive field campaign was carried out in summer 2014
in Wangdu, located in the North China Plain. A month of
continuous OH, HO2 and RO2 measurements was achieved.
Observations of radicals by the laser-induced fluorescence
(LIF) technique revealed daily maximum concentrations
between (5–15) × 106 cm−3,
(3–14) × 108 cm−3 and
(3–15) × 108 cm−3 for OH, HO2 and RO2,
respectively. Measured OH reactivities (inverse OH lifetime)
were 10 to 20 s−1 during daytime. The chemical box model
RACM 2, including the Leuven isoprene mechanism (LIM), was
used to interpret the observed radical concentrations. As in
previous field campaigns in China, modeled and measured OH
concentrations agree for NO mixing ratios higher than
1 ppbv, but systematic discrepancies are observed in the
afternoon for NO mixing ratios of less than 300 pptv (the
model–measurement ratio is between 1.4 and 2 in this
case). If additional OH recycling equivalent to 100 pptv
NO is assumed, the model is capable of reproducing the
observed OH, HO2 and RO2 concentrations for conditions of
high volatile organic compound (VOC) and low NOx
concentrations. For HO2, good agreement is found between
modeled and observed concentrations during day and night. In
the case of RO2, the agreement between model calculations
and measurements is good in the late afternoon when NO
concentrations are below 0.3 ppbv. A significant model
underprediction of RO2 by a factor of 3 to 5 is found in the
morning at NO concentrations higher than 1 ppbv, which can
be explained by a missing RO2 source of 2 ppbv h−1. As
a consequence, the model underpredicts the photochemical net
ozone production by 20 ppbv per day, which is a
significant portion of the daily integrated ozone production
(110 ppbv) derived from the measured HO2 and RO2. The
additional RO2 production from the photolysis of ClNO2 and
missing reactivity can explain about $10 \%$ and $20 \%$
of the discrepancy, respectively. The underprediction of the
photochemical ozone production at high NOx found in this
study is consistent with the results from other field
campaigns in urban environments, which underlines the need
for better understanding of the peroxy radical chemistry for
high NOx conditions.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
transformation processes (POF3-243)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000393892700003},
doi = {10.5194/acp-17-663-2017},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826194},
}