000826716 001__ 826716
000826716 005__ 20210129225658.0
000826716 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/13643
000826716 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1866-1793
000826716 020__ $$a978-3-95806-190-3
000826716 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-00934
000826716 041__ $$aEnglish
000826716 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145951$$aPost, Hanna$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$gfemale$$ufzj
000826716 245__ $$aOn model and measurement uncertainty in predicting land surface carbon fluxes$$f- 2015-05-31
000826716 260__ $$aJülich$$bForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag$$c2016
000826716 300__ $$axviii, 135 S.
000826716 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Dissertation
000826716 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)3$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aBook$$mbook
000826716 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aDISSERTATION
000826716 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aPHDTHESIS
000826716 3367_ $$02$$2EndNote$$aThesis
000826716 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)11$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aDissertation / PhD Thesis$$bphd$$mphd$$s1485425862_32142
000826716 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$adoctoralThesis
000826716 4900_ $$aSchriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich Reihe Energie & Umwelt / Energy & Environment$$v347
000826716 502__ $$aRWTH Aachen, Diss., 2016$$bDr.$$cRWTH Aachen$$d2016
000826716 520__ $$aThe Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE) of CO$_{2}$ between the land surface and the atmosphere refers to the difference of photosynthetic CO$_{2}$ uptake and CO$_{2}$ release via ecosystem respiration. NEE is an important indicator for the net carbon source or sink function of an ecosystem and a crucial variable for understanding and predicting feedback mechanisms between climate and ecosystem change. NEE is typically measured by micrometeorological methods like eddy covariance (EC). At continental or global scales, land surface models (LSMs) such as the Community Land Model (CLM) are commonly used to predict NEE and other fluxes by simulating the coupled carbon, nitrogen, water and energy cycle of the land surface. In order to support future decision making in climate politics and environmental planning, it is important to improve LSM carbon flux predictions at regional scales. A central goal of this PhD work was therefore to combine measured EC data and CLM to estimate NEE for the Rur catchment area. For the last decade, model-data fusion approaches like parameter estimation have increasingly been applied to reduce the uncertainty of carbon flux estimates, because both EC measurements and LSM predictions are uncertain. In order to use EC data in meaningful model-data fusion or LSM evaluation approaches, an estimate of the measurement uncertainty is required. Thus, in the first part of the thesis, the NEE measurement uncertainty was studied for one grassland site in Germany located in the Rur catchment. At present, many uncertainty estimation approaches exist, but none are generally accepted and applied. The classical two-tower approach, which is based on the standard deviations of the fluxes measured simultaneously at two nearby EC towers, is one of the most well-known approaches. It provides linear regression functions between the flux magnitude and the random error, which are commonly adopted by scientists for a fast estimation of the random error. In previous studies, the (classical) two-tower approach has yielded robust uncertainty estimates, but care must be taken to meet the often competing requirements of statistical independence (non-overlapping footprints) and ecosystem homogeneity when choosing an appropriate tower distance. Thus, an extension of the classical two-tower approach is proposed here that corrects systematic differences of the NEE fluxes measured synchronous at the two EC tower stations. The role of the tower distance was investigated with help of a roving station separated between 8 m and 34 km from a permanent EC grassland station. For evaluation, uncertainty estimates obtained from a different, raw-data based method were used as reference. The herein introduced correction for systematic flux differences applied to weather-filtered data substantially reduced the overestimation of the two-tower based NEE measurement uncertainty for all distances (except 8 m) by 79% (34 km distance) to 100% (95 m distance). Results indicated that the sensitivity of the two-tower approach to the tower distance was reduced, which enhances the applicability of the extended two-tower approach. [...]
000826716 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000826716 650_7 $$xDiss.
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000826716 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/826716/files/Energie_Umwelt_347.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000826716 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:826716$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000826716 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000826716 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000826716 9141_ $$y2016
000826716 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145951$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000826716 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000826716 920__ $$lyes
000826716 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000826716 980__ $$aphd
000826716 980__ $$aVDB
000826716 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000826716 980__ $$abook
000826716 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000826716 9801_ $$aFullTexts