001     826819
005     20210129225713.0
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-01036
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Robles Aguilar, Ana Alejandra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)151189
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a Conference: WEF/IWA Nutrient Removal and Recovery 2016
|c Denver, Colorado
|d 2016-07-10 - 2016-07-13
|w USA
245 _ _ |a Effectiveness of Recycled Phosphorus as Struvite is Modulated by the Nitrogen Source Applied
260 _ _ |c 2016
300 _ _ |a 05-A 1-13
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_PAPER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Paper
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Contribution to a conference proceedings
|b contrib
|m contrib
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)8
|s 1485717937_6012
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
520 _ _ |a Recycling of phosphorus (P) from waste materials is an important approach to develop sustainably an efficient and clean fertilizer for many countries with no phosphorus rock deposits.We evaluated the P fertilizing value of struvite, a precipitate traditionally recovered from waste water treatments. We investigated how the P availability differs between 1) two plant species, Zea mays and Lupinus angustifolius, employing different nutrient acquisition strategies, and 2) two different forms of nitrogen (N) fertilizer: ammonium and nitrate which causes respectively rhizosphere acidification or alkalization. We had a non-fertilized and a with triples-superphosphate (TSP) fertilized controls. Plants were grown on an acidic sand in the greenhouse.Struvite had as high P recovery (P uptake/P applied) as TSP. In both species fertigation with ammonium resulted in a significantly greater P uptake (g/root surface area), but not greater total uptake as plants fertigated with nitrate had greater root surface area. Possibly ammonium uptake resulted in rhizosphere acidification and thereby greater mobilization and uptake of P.We propose that struvite can be used as a sustainable phosphorus fertilizer on acidic sandy soils.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
650 2 7 |a Biology
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-160
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Bodewein, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129288
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Schrey, Silvia
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166424
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Postma, Johannes Auke
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Blossfeld, Stephan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129286
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Temperton, Vicky
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Jablonowski, Nicolai David
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|b 6
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:826819
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)151189
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129288
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166424
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a contrib
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21