001     827963
005     20220930130117.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.116.187047
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2159-662X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000400633500008
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-01991
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Stegmayr, Carina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156479
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Influence of bevacizumab on blood-brain barrier permeability and O-(2- 18 F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake in rat gliomas
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2017
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1495456860_25475
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Restoration of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) after antiangiogenic therapy of gliomas with bevacizumab may result in a decrease in contrast enhancement on MRI despite tumor progression. This so-called pseudoresponse is difficult to differentiate from a true tumor response with conventional MRI. Initial patient studies have indicated that PET using O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) may be helpful for solving this diagnostic problem. This study was performed to investigate the effects of bevacizumab on BBB permeability and 18F-FET uptake in a human xenograft model. Methods: Human U87 glioblastoma cells were implanted into the striatum of immunodeficient RNU rats. 18F-FET PET scans and ex vivo autoradiography were performed in animals receiving a single high dose of bevacizumab (45 mg/kg 2 d before PET; n = 9) or in animals receiving 2 lower doses (10 mg/kg 9 and 2 d before PET; n = 10) to evaluate short-term and long-term effects on the BBB, respectively, and in control animals without bevacizumab treatment (n = 8). Time–activity curves, slope, and tumor-to-brain ratios of 18F-FET uptake (18–61 min after injection) were evaluated using a volume-of-interest analysis. After PET scanning, Evans blue dye (EBD) was injected into animals, and cryosections of the brains were evaluated by autoradiography, by histology, and for EBD fluorescence to assess BBB permeability. Results: Compared with the control, short-term bevacizumab therapy resulted in a trend toward BBB restoration (P = 0.055) and long-term therapy resulted in a significant decrease (P = 0.004) in BBB permeability, as assessed by EBD fluorescence. In contrast, no significant differences in tumor-to-brain ratios or slope of 18F-FET uptake were observed in PET and autoradiography (P > 0.05). Conclusion: 8F-FET uptake in glioblastomas seems to be largely independent of BBB permeability and reflects the viability of tumor tissue during antiangiogenic therapy more reliably than contrast-enhanced MRI
536 _ _ |a 573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|c POF3-573
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Oliveira, Dennis
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165631
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Niemietz, Nicole
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142279
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Willuweit, Antje
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144347
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Lohmann, Philipp
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145110
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, Norbert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Shah, N. J.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131794
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Ermert, Johannes
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131818
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Langen, Karl-Josef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
|b 8
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.116.187047
|g p. jnumed.116.187047 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|n 5
|p 700-705
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v 58
|y 2017
|x 2159-662X
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:827963
|p VDB
|p OpenAPC
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)156479
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165631
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144347
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145110
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131794
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131818
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Neuroimaging
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2015
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
|k INM-4
|l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406
|k INM-5
|l Nuklearchemie
|x 2
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-5-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21