% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Born:828064,
      author       = {Born, Sabine and Krüger, Hannah M. and Zimmermann, Eckart
                      and Cavanagh, Patrick},
      title        = {{C}ompression of {S}pace for {L}ow {V}isibility {P}robes},
      journal      = {Frontiers in systems neuroscience},
      volume       = {10},
      issn         = {1662-5137},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-02069},
      pages        = {Article 21},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {Stimuli briefly flashed just before a saccade are perceived
                      closer to the saccade target, a phenomenon known as
                      perisaccadic compression of space (Ross et al., 1997). More
                      recently, we have demonstrated that brief probes are
                      attracted towards a visual reference when followed by a
                      mask, even in the absence of saccades (Zimmermann et al.,
                      2014a). Here, we ask whether spatial compression depends on
                      the transient disruptions of the visual input stream caused
                      by either a mask or a saccade. Both of these degrade the
                      probe visibility but we show that low probe visibility alone
                      causes compression in the absence of any disruption. In a
                      first experiment, we varied the regions of the screen
                      covered by a transient mask, including areas where no
                      stimulus was presented and a condition without masking. In
                      all conditions, we adjusted probe contrast to make the probe
                      equally hard to detect. Compression effects were found in
                      all conditions. To obtain compression without a mask, the
                      probe had to be presented at much lower contrasts than with
                      masking. Comparing mislocalizations at different probe
                      detection rates across masking, saccades and low contrast
                      conditions without mask or saccade, Experiment 2 confirmed
                      this observation and showed a strong influence of probe
                      contrast on compression. Finally, in Experiment 3, we found
                      that compression decreased as probe duration increased both
                      for masks and saccades although here we did find some
                      evidence that factors other than simply visibility as we
                      measured it contribute to compression. Our experiments
                      suggest that compression reflects how the visual system
                      localizes weak targets in the context of highly visible
                      stimuli.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:27013989},
      UT           = {WOS:000371763000001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnsys.2016.00021},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828064},
}