% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Sprenger:828548,
author = {Sprenger, Julia and Zehl, Lyuba and Canova, Carlos and
Grün, Sonja and Denker, Michael},
title = {od{ML}-tables: {P}roviding a graphical interface for od{ML}
based metadata management},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-02502},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Experimental observations are an essential part of
scientific research and are used to validate or reject a
scientific hypothesis. In the scientific approach,
observations are typically quantified and data are recorded
for subsequent analysis. These primary data are always
accompanied by information about their origin and the
circumstances of their recording. Such information is
typically called metadata and includes a variety of
information, such as, the date of the recording, a seemingly
unimportant change in measurement settings or the
expectation of the experimenter (open trial vs. blind trial
experiments). Metadata are crucial for performing
reproducible data analysis and are essential for the
interpretation of the results. They also enable queries to
answer scientific questions that researchers did not
previously consider (e.g. transversal studies) and are one
of the main components for implementing replicable and
reproducible research [1]. In addition a comprehensive
metadata collection facilitates the communication between
members of a project and therefore saves valuable time and
effort. In neuroscience, and in particular experimental
neurophysiology, the development of approaches to metadata
management is an ongoing effort [2]. A promising metadata
framework in this field is odML (open metadata Markup
Language) [3]. This XML-based language is designed to
represent complex metadata collections as hierarchically
organized key-value pairs.In practice however, embedding
metadata based on the odML framework into workflows for
sharing data in concrete use cases of experimental and
theoretical groups revealed that generating the structure of
an odML document, and later filling it with metadata from
the respective sources, involved extensive programming
experience [2]. In addition there are always metadata, which
require manual entry during or after the experiment. The
lack of software support for certain processing steps and
editing capabilities in these use cases effectively
prevented our experimental partners from using odML to
capture metadata into one coherent collection. To address
this shortcoming, we developed odML-tables, a software
solution that bridges the gap between hierarchical odML and
a tabular representation of metadata that is convenient for
editing.odML-tables is an open-source software tool
implemented in Python, which offers a graphical user
interface (GUI) [4,5]. The main features of odML-tables
are:1) Generation of a template (tabular) structure
facilitating the initial design of an odML structure2)
Conversion between odML files and tabular formats (.xls,
.csv) in order to enable manual entry and modifications
using spreadsheet software (e.g., Microsoft Excel,
LibreOffice).3) Filtering metadata by defined search
criteria to simplify access to parts of a complex odML
structure4) Merging of multiple odML files5) Generation of a
comparison table of similar entries within an odML fileWe
show how odML-tables can be applied in a sustainable
workflow for metadata management and illustrate the
practical usage of odML-tables from structuring available
metadata to daily enrichment of the metadata collection (cf.
also [1,2]).References:[1] Denker, M., $\&$ Grün, S.
(2016). Designing workflows for the reproducible Analysis of
Electrophys-iological Data. In: Brain Inspired Computing,
eds: Katrin Amunts, Lucio Grandinetti, Thomas Lippert,
Nicolai Petkov. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer.
(in press)[2] Zehl, L., Jaillet, F., Stoewer, A., Grewe, J.,
Sobolev, A., Wachtler, T., Brochier, T., Riehle, A., Denker,
M., $\&$ Grün, S. Handling Metadata in a Neurophysiology
Laboratory. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10, 26.[3] Grewe,
J., Wachtler, T., $\&$ Benda, J. (2011). A Bottom-up
Approach to Data Annotation in Neurophysiology. Frontiers in
Neuroinformatics, 5, 16.[4] python-odmltables on PyPi:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-odmltables/[5]
python-odmltables on GitHub:
https://github.com/INM-6/python-odmltables},
month = {Mar},
date = {2017-03-22},
organization = {12th Göttingen Meeting of the German
Neuroscience Society, Göttingen
(Germany), 22 Mar 2017 - 25 Mar 2017},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {INM-6 / IAS-6},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828},
pnm = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571) / SMHB -
Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain
(HGF-SMHB-2013-2017) / HBP SGA1 - Human Brain Project
Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270) / DFG project 237833830
- Optogenetische Analyse der für kognitive Fähigkeiten
zuständigen präfrontal-hippokampalen Netzwerke in der
Entwicklung (237833830) / DFG project 238707842 - Kausative
Mechanismen mesoskopischer Aktivitätsmuster in der
auditorischen Kategorien-Diskrimination (238707842)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571 / G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017 /
G:(EU-Grant)720270 / G:(GEPRIS)237833830 /
G:(GEPRIS)238707842},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828548},
}