% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Meister:828973,
      author       = {Meister, Paul and Fromm, Olga and Rothermel, Sergej and
                      Kasnatscheew, Johannes and Winter, Martin and Placke,
                      Tobias},
      title        = {{S}odium-{B}ased vs. {L}ithium-{B}ased {D}ual-{I}on
                      {C}ells: {E}lectrochemical {S}tudy of {A}nion
                      {I}ntercalation/{D}e-{I}ntercalation into/from {G}raphite
                      and {M}etal {P}lating/{D}issolution {B}ehavior},
      journal      = {Electrochimica acta},
      volume       = {228},
      issn         = {0013-4686},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-02790},
      pages        = {18 - 27},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Energy storage systems utilizing a simultaneous
                      intercalation of anions into a graphite host structure at
                      the positive electrode and intercalation/insertion/reduction
                      or deposition of cations at the negative electrode during
                      charge, were introduced under the term dual-ion cells,
                      recently. In this work, the electrochemical intercalation of
                      TFSI− anions into graphite has been studied in
                      sodium‐based dual‐ion cells (SDICs) at different upper
                      cut‐off potentials varying between 4.5 V and 4.7 V vs.
                      Na/Na+. Electrochemical characteristics of SDICs, including
                      the reversible capacity, Coulombic efficiency, energy
                      efficiency and onset potentials for anion intercalation,
                      were evaluated in comparison to the lithium-based dual-ions
                      cells (LDICs). A stable charge/discharge cycling performance
                      over 500 cycles has been found for SDICs providing a
                      specific capacity of ≈ 32 mAh g‐1 and a Coulombic
                      efficiency exceeding $99\%$ at an upper cut‐off potential
                      of 4.7 V vs. Na/Na+ at the graphite cathode. By the addition
                      of the electrolyte additive ethylene sulfite (ES), an
                      increase of the reversible capacity to ≈ 46 mAh g‐1 was
                      achieved. Furthermore, possible reasons for the overall
                      inferior cycling performance in terms of capacity for SDICs
                      as compared to LDICs such as an increased overpotential for
                      plating/stripping of Na+ ions as compared to Li+ ions are
                      discussed. In this respect, we also found that the addition
                      of ethylene sulfite particularly decreases the
                      overpotentials for the metal plating process, which at least
                      partially explains the enhanced reversible capacity in LDICs
                      and SDICs by using ES as electrolyte additive.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000395211600003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.034},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828973},
}