000828979 001__ 828979
000828979 005__ 20240712113119.0
000828979 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1039/C6AY02264B
000828979 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1759-9660
000828979 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1759-9679
000828979 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/14154
000828979 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000385380800014
000828979 037__ $$aFZJ-2017-02796
000828979 082__ $$a540
000828979 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWilken, A.$$b0
000828979 245__ $$aA fluoride-selective electrode (Fse) for the quantification of fluoride in lithium-ion battery (Lib) electrolytes
000828979 260__ $$aCambridge$$bRSC Publ.$$c2016
000828979 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000828979 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000828979 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1491569419_655
000828979 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000828979 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000828979 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000828979 520__ $$aIn this work, a fluoride-selective electrode (FSE) was applied with regard to the analysis of fluoride in lithium hexafluorophosphate-based lithium-ion battery (LIB) electrolytes. The influence of linear organic carbonate solvents dimethyl carbonate (DMC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) which are used as co-solvents in battery electrolytes was investigated. The developed FSE method for the analysis of battery electrolytes was comprehensively validated in view of the (1) trueness and recovery rates (nominal vs. actual comparison; influence of different amounts of electrolytes on the performance of the electrode; recovery rates of defined differences in concentration), (2) precision (intra-day precision and inter-day precision), (3) selectivity (influence of the carbonate solvents on different fluoride concentrations; interferents) and (4) linearity and range. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the data and to characterize the reproducibility of the method. The determination of the commercially available LP30 (1 mol LiPF6 and ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (EC : DMC, 50 : 50 wt%)) electrolyte stored over 47 days and at 80 °C, by the FSE technique was compared to the fluoride analysis by ion chromatography (IC). While interferences in the IC method resulted in false-high concentrations, the FSE operated free from interferences, selective and specific. The validation of the method was successfully carried out and enables new areas of application.
000828979 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131$$a131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)$$cPOF3-131$$fPOF III$$x0
000828979 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000828979 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKraft, V.$$b1
000828979 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGirod, S.$$b2
000828979 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166130$$aWinter, M.$$b3$$ufzj
000828979 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNowak, S.$$b4$$eCorresponding author
000828979 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2515210-5$$a10.1039/C6AY02264B$$gVol. 8, no. 38, p. 6932 - 6940$$n38$$p6932 - 6940$$tAnalytical methods$$v8$$x1759-9679$$y2016
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000828979 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/828979/files/c6ay02264b.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000828979 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:828979$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000828979 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166130$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000828979 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vElectrochemical Storage$$x0
000828979 9141_ $$y2017
000828979 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bANAL METHODS-UK : 2015
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000828979 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000828979 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217$$kIEK-12$$lHelmholtz-Institut Münster Ionenleiter für Energiespeicher$$x0
000828979 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000828979 980__ $$ajournal
000828979 980__ $$aVDB
000828979 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000828979 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217
000828979 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217