% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INPROCEEDINGS{Andresen:829501,
      author       = {Andresen, Erik and Haensel, David and Chraibi, Mohcine and
                      Seyfried, Armin},
      title        = {{T}he {I}mpact of {P}erception and {W}ayfinding on
                      {P}edestrian {M}ovements},
      journal      = {Collective dynamics},
      volume       = {1},
      number       = {A11},
      issn         = {2366-8539},
      address      = {Köln},
      publisher    = {Institut für Theoretische Physik},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-03194},
      isbn         = {9787312040771},
      pages        = {1-618},
      year         = {2016},
      comment      = {Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on
                      Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics (PED2016)},
      booktitle     = {Proceedings of the 8th International
                       Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation
                       Dynamics (PED2016)},
      abstract     = {When simulating non-trivial scenarios of pedestrian
                      movements it is necessary to model boththe small-scale
                      movements to a visible target (operational level) and the
                      process to find and select routesleading to a possibly
                      non-visible destination (tactical level). A huge number of
                      different approaches modellingthe operational level of
                      pedestrian movements are already proposed. However, the
                      majority of models of thetactical level are still restricted
                      to shortest path algorithms or similar algorithms
                      determining minimal travelefforts. These approaches assume
                      that pedestrians have unrestricted knowledge about the
                      spatial structureof buildings or facilities and are able to
                      assess lengths and travel times of all possible routes. In
                      fact, inreality the knowledge degree of people differs
                      widely. In addition, wayfinding is a complex process
                      includingvarious tools and strategies which are represented
                      only roughly by minimum-effort calculations. To improvethe
                      situation we present modelling approaches representing tools
                      and strategies of human wayfinding anddecision making based
                      on evidence from psychological studies and literature.
                      Furthermore, an approach hasbeen created to consider
                      perception in addition to decision making to model
                      wayfinding. In particular, weanalyse the consequences and
                      differences appearing in the simulation of complex scenarios
                      when consideringmore elaborated wayfinding procedures
                      instead of using classic minimum effort calculations. To
                      quantifythe consequences and differences we particularly
                      investigate resulting evacuation times. For this purpose
                      weutilize the results of evacuation simulations taken place
                      in the National Gallery of Arts in Washington,
                      D.C..Comparing the results of simulations considering
                      wayfinding approaches and shortest path calculations
                      wediscuss pros and cons, limits, possibilities and the
                      importance of perception and wayfinding models.},
      month         = {Oct},
      date          = {2016-10-17},
      organization  = {8th International Conference on
                       Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics
                       (PED2016), Hefei (China), 17 Oct 2016 -
                       21 Oct 2016},
      cin          = {JSC},
      ddc          = {380},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
      pnm          = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
                      (POF3-511)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16 / PUB:(DE-HGF)8 / PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829501},
}