% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Heinrichs:829520,
      author       = {Heinrichs, Heidi and Schumann, Diana and Vögele, Stefan
                      and Biss, Klaus and Shamon, Hawal and Markewitz, Peter and
                      Többen, Johannes and Gillessen, Bastian and Gotzens, Fabian
                      and Ernst, Anna},
      title        = {{I}ntegrated assessment of a phase-out of coal-fired power
                      plants in {G}ermany},
      journal      = {Energy},
      volume       = {126},
      issn         = {0360-5442},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2017-03205},
      pages        = {285 - 305},
      year         = {2017},
      abstract     = {Germany is liable to miss its greenhouse gas reduction
                      target for 2020. Nonetheless, additional political measures
                      such as an early phase-out of coal-fired power plants might
                      make it possible to reach this target. However, this
                      generates several (conflicting) challenges, which arise from
                      the technical, environmental, economic, and social
                      implications.An integrated assessment of phasing out
                      coal-fired power plants was therefore performed by
                      investigating impacts on the German energy system, the
                      economy, and public perception. The latter is explored by
                      analyzing representative data from our latest annual survey
                      of the German public. Economic impacts on the sectoral level
                      are illustrated by an input-output analysis. Furthermore, an
                      energy systems model examines the long-term technical
                      consequences.Our scenario-based analysis shows that phasing
                      out coal in the German electricity sector is not sufficient
                      to fully meet German emission reduction targets.
                      Additionally, the input-output analysis indicates strong
                      sensitivity with the CO2 certificate price, only resulting
                      in an overall economic benefit in the case of a high
                      certificate price. The survey shows that public acceptance
                      of coal for electricity generation is low and decreasing. By
                      combining all the results, a more detailed analysis was
                      performed of the consequences of an early phase-out of
                      coal-fired power plants.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153) / HITEC -
                      Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and
                      Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 / G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000404305900024},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.017},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829520},
}