001     829645
005     20210129230327.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/15326
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2017-03314
100 1 _ |a Heinrichs, Heidi
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145221
|b 0
111 2 _ |a Energy for Society: 1st International Conference on Energy Research and Social Science
|c Sitges
|d 2017-04-02 - 2017-04-05
|w Spain
245 _ _ |a Creating transparent, plausible, relevant, and consistent energy scenarios
260 _ _ |c 2017
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a Other
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a LECTURE_SPEECH
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Presentation
|b conf
|m conf
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)6
|s 1506089338_7845
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
520 _ _ |a The transformation towards a sustainable energy system is characterized by highly complex and uncertain processes. Energy scenario development is a tool to generate strategies to manage this process. However, the traditional practices of energy scenario development are primarily focusing on modelling processes that contain a mathematical description of essential technical and economic system properties such as efficiency of technologies, installed capacities, CO2 emission factors as well as investments and operating costs. In most quantitative energy scenarios social impacts such as changing institutions, practices, and value systems in which technological and economical energy systems are embedded, are lacking. That is why those energy scenarios are criticised as being not transparent about intrinsic assumptions and uncertainties which result in predispositions. In addition, criteria such as plausibility, consistency, consistent, and relevance are important determinants to ensure the development of energy scenarios that provide valid insights on future energy challenges and policy implications. This paper will present a multimethod design to generate qualitative scenarios, which is characterised by deliberative and analytical phases. In the first phase deliberative methods; meaning the inclusion of external experts; are applied to develop draft storylines from scratch integrating multiple perspectives and sources of expertise. In the next phase the Future Wheel-method was used to identify direct and indirect consequences of focused trends derived from the draft storylines. This was followed by a Cross-Impact Balance analysis in the interest of ensuring consistency. In a fourth phase the draft qualitative energy scenarios are deliberatively tested. Our findings reflect on how the applied multimethod design has contributed to create transparency, plausibility, consistency, and relevance.
536 _ _ |a 153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|c POF3-153
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406
|x 1
|c HITEC-20170406
|a HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)
700 1 _ |a Voegele, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130491
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Gotzens, Fabian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166140
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gillessen, Bastian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161547
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schumann, Diana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130485
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Shamon, Hawal
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168187
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Kunz, Paul
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169526
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Biss, Klaus
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)8462
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Ernst, Anna
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)162255
|b 8
|e Corresponding author
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829645/files/Ernst%20et%20al%20Multimethod%20design%20for%20generating%20Energy%20Scenarios%20final%2016.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:829645
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145221
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130491
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)166140
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161547
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130485
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168187
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169526
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)8462
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)162255
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Technologie, Innovation und Gesellschaft
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-150
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|v Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of Energy Efficiency and Energy Security
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Energie
914 1 _ |y 2017
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a conf
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21