% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pinto:829744,
author = {Pinto, Francisco and Müller-Linow, Mark and Schickling,
Anke and Cendrero, Pilar and Ballvora, Agim and Rascher,
Uwe},
title = {{M}ultiangular {O}bservation of {C}anopy {S}un-{I}nduced
{C}hlorophyll {F}luorescence by {C}ombining {I}maging
{S}pectroscopy and {S}tereoscopy},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {9},
number = {5},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2017-03382},
pages = {415},
year = {2017},
abstract = {The effect that the canopy structure and the viewing
geometry have on the intensity and the spatial distribution
of passively measured sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
at canopy scale is still not well understood. These
uncertainties constrain the potential use of fluorescence to
quantify photosynthesis at this level. Using a novel
technique, we evaluated the diurnal changes in the spatial
distribution of sun-induced fluorescence at 760 nm (F760)
within the canopy as a consequence of the spatial
disposition of the leaves and the viewing angle of the
sensor. High resolution spectral and stereo images of a full
sugar beet canopy were recorded simultaneously in the field
to estimate maps of F760 and the surface angle distribution,
respectively. A dedicated algorithm was used to align both
maps in the post-processing and its accuracy was evaluated
using a sensitivity test. The relative angle between sun and
the leaf surfaces primarily determined the amount of
incident Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR), which in
turn was reflected in different values of F760, with the
highest values occurring in leaf surfaces that are
perpendicularly oriented to the sun. The viewing angle of
the sensor also had an impact in the intensity of the
recorded F760. Higher viewing angles generally resulted in
higher values of F760. We attribute these changes to a
direct effect of the vegetation directional reflectance
response on fluorescence retrieval. Consequently, at leaf
surface level, the spatio-temporal variations of F760 were
mainly explained by the sun–leaf–sensor geometry rather
than directionality of the fluorescence emission. At canopy
scale, the diurnal patterns of F760 observed on the
top-of-canopy were attributed to the complex interplay
between the light penetration into the canopy as a function
of the display of the various leaves and the fluorescence
emission of each leaf which is modulated by the exposure of
the individual leaf patch to the incoming light and the
functional status of photosynthesis. We expect that forward
modeling can help derive analytical simplified skeleton
assumptions to scale canopy measurements to the leaf
functional properties.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582) / DPPN - Deutsches Pflanzen
Phänotypisierungsnetzwerk (BMBF-031A053A) / BMBF-0315532A -
CROP.SENSe.net (BMBF-0315532A)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582 / G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-031A053A /
G:(DE-Juel1)BMBF-0315532A},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000402573700018},
doi = {10.3390/rs9050415},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/829744},
}